Betty MacDonald, her friends and some assholes in the world
Hello 'Pussy' this is Mrs. Piggle-Wiggle:
The Pentagon's new secretary of defense believes, and is on record
saying, that we should "have a plan to kill everybody you meet," that
"if you f*ck with me, I'll kill you all," and that "there are some
assholes in the world that just need to be shot".
Bombastic braggadocios aren't helpful at the
Pentagon helm. This language may serve a purpose within the defense
industry, as it props up their for-profit modus operandi. But in terms
of aiding international affairs, it's caustic and antagonistic and will
only get us into more wars, not fewer.
Do you have any idea why they feel so ashamed? I do!
Should I remain in bed, leave my country or fight against the dragon?
( see also the story by Wolfgang Hampel, ' Betty MacDonald: Nothing more to say ' )
Betty and Don MacDonald in Hollywood
Betty MacDonald's mother Sydney with grandchild Alison Beck
You can win a Betty MacDonald fan club surprise gift if you can answer our question:
Where did Betty MacDonald meet her wonderful friend Mike? This is my favourite city for next International Betty MacDonald fan club event 2017.
If you know the city don't miss the chance, please to send us a mail as soon as you can.
If you are lucky enough you are our Betty MacDonald fan club contest winner today. Betty MacDonald fan club founder Wolfgang Hampel
and Betty MacDonald fan club research team are going to include all
these new details and info in updated Betty MacDonald biography.
More info in next Betty MacDonald fan club newsletters. If you'd like to join Betty MacDonald fan club as a
follower you only have to press the join button on Betty MacDonald fan
club blog.
This
very new Betty MacDonald biography includes all the results we got
during a very successful Betty MacDonald fan club research which started
in 1983.
You'll be able to find unique Betty MacDonald treasures in our Betty MacDonald biography.
Betty MacDonald biography includes for example interviews with Betty MacDonald, her family and friends.
We got many letters by Betty MacDonald and other family members even very important original ones.
Our
goal is to publish a Betty MacDonald biography that shows all the
details of Betty MacDonald's life and work but also to present her
fascinating siblings.
Dear Betty MacDonald fan club fans let us know please what you are interested most in a future Betty MacDonald biography.
Our next Betty MacDonald fan club project is a collection of these unique dedications.
If you
share your dedication from your Betty MacDonald - and Mary Bard Jensen
collection you might be the winner of our new Betty MacDonald fan club
items.
Thank you so much in advance for your support.
Thank you so much for sending us your favourite Betty MacDonald quote.
Thank you so much for sharing this witty memories with us.
Wolfgang Hampel's literary event Vita Magica
is very fascinating because he is going to include Betty MacDonald,
other members of the Bard family and Betty MacDonald fan club honor
members.
I agree with Betty in this very witty Betty MacDonald story Betty MacDonald: Nothing more to say by Wolfgang Hampel.
I
can't imagine to live in a country with him as so-called elected
President although there are very good reasons to remain there to fight
against these brainless politics.
The Senate Democrats' sound and fury over
President Donald Trump's cabinet picks and his political agenda is
apparently signifying nothing – at least on defense policy. The fact
that the Senate quickly confirmed General James "Mad Dog" Mattis by a
vote of 98-1
late Friday afternoon in the wake of inauguration activities shows that
even progressive Democrats, such as Sens. Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth
Warren, don't have the stomach for a foreign policy fight with Trump's
new Pentagon. That's how effectively Trump and perhaps even Mattis'
defense industry connections are already bullying Washington into submission.
Sanders justified his vote by saying
that while Mattis wasn't the nominee he preferred, "in a Trump cabinet
likely to be loaded up with right-wing extremists, all of whom I will
oppose, I hope General Mattis will have a moderating influence on some
of the racist and xenophobic views that President Trump advocated
throughout the campaign." This is incredibly wishful and relativistic
thinking. Mattis will never be a moderating influence, and he's already
exhibited racist and xenophobic thinking by the ways in which he views
the adversary.
The Pentagon's new secretary of defense believes, and is on record
saying, that we should "have a plan to kill everybody you meet," that
"if you f*ck with me, I'll kill you all," and that "there are some
assholes in the world that just need to be shot".
Bombastic braggadocios aren't helpful at the
Pentagon helm. This language may serve a purpose within the defense
industry, as it props up their for-profit modus operandi. But in terms
of aiding international affairs, it's caustic and antagonistic and will
only get us into more wars, not fewer.
Mattis, moreover, thinks that shooting people is
"just business" and that it's "a hell of a lot of fun to shoot them."
This is exactly the kind of attitude that leads to U.S. Marines
urinating on dead Afghan bodies. When our new defense secretary says
that killing is "a hell of a hoot," and that "It's fun to shoot some
people," we are inculcating a culture of indiscriminate violence. This
is not level-headed and will undoubtedly lead to more trickle-down
killing and callousness.
Don't miss these very interesting articles below, please.
Lately,
it appears Trump has gone back into the field to drag in a whole new
bunch of State contenders.
My favorite is Representative Dana
Rohrabacher of California, a person you have probably never heard of
even though he’s been in Congress since the 1980s and is currently head
of the prestigious Subcommittee on Europe, Eurasia and Emerging Threats.
I think the future dinosaur flatulence will be the behaviour of 'Pussy' and his very strange government.
Poor World! Poor America!
Don't miss these very interesting articles below, please.
The most difficult case in Mrs.Piggle-Wiggle's career
Hello 'Pussy', this is Mrs. Piggle-Wiggle.
You
took calls from foreign leaders on unsecured phone lines, without
consultung the State Department. We have to change your silly behaviour
with a new Mrs. Piggle-Wiggle cure. I know you are the most difficult
case in my career - but we have to try everything.......................
Betty MacDonald was sitting on her egg-shaped cloud and listened to a rather strange guy.
He said to his friends: So sorry to keep you waiting. Very complicated business! Very complicated!
Betty said: Obviously much too complicated for you old toupee!
Besides him ( by the way the First Lady's place ) his 10 year old son was bored to death and listened to this 'exciting' victory speech.
The old man could be his great-grandfather.
The
boy was very tired and thought: I don't know what this old guy is
talking about. Come on and finish it, please. I'd like to go to bed. Dear 'great-grandfather' continued and praised the Democratic candidate.
He always called her the most corrupt person ever and repeated it over and over again in the fashion of a Tibetan prayer wheel.
She is so corrupt. She is so corrupt. Do you know how corrupt she is?
Betty MacDonald couldn't believe it when he said: She
has worked very long and very hard over a long period of time, and we
owe her a major debt of gratitude for her service to our country.
Afterwards old toupee praised his parents, wife, children, siblings and friends.
He asked the same question like a parrot all the time: Where are you? Where are you? Where are you? I know you are here!
Betty MacDonald answered: No Pussy they are not! They left the country.
They immigrated to Canada
because they are very much afraid of the future in the U.S.A. with you
as their leader like the majority of all so-called more or less normal
citizens.
This
is incredible! I'll You get what you pay/vote for and Trump is the
epitome of this ideology. America I won't feel bad for you because you
don't need my sympathy for what's coming but I am genuinely scared for
you. 'Forgive them lord for they know not who they do' or maybe they do
but just don't care about their future generations who will suffer for
this long after the culprits have passed away.
Wise guy, North Pole, Svalbard And Jan Mayen, 9 minutes ago
Is the USA like North Korea where you can't trust other politicians?
That's it.
Put Ivanka in! Put Ivanka in! Put my whole family and friends in! ' What about Putin?
Or the leaders from China and North Korea?
Wouldn't it be a great idea to put them in too?
What about very intelligent and qualified Sarah Palin?
In 2006, Palin obtained a passport[88] and in 2007 traveled for the first time outside of North America on a trip to Kuwait. There she visited the Khabari Alawazem Crossing at the Kuwait–Iraq border and met with members of the Alaska National Guard at several bases.[89] On her return journey she visited injured soldiers in Germany.[90] That's the reason why very intelligent and brilliant Sarah Palin knows the World very well. Sarah and ' Pussygate ' will rule America and the World - what a couple.
Wolfgang
Hampel's Betty MacDonald and Ma and Pa Kettle biography and Betty
MacDonald interviews have fans in 40 countries. I'm one of their many devoted fans.
Many Betty MacDonald - and Wolfgang Hampel fans are very interested in a Wolfgang Hampel CD and DVD with his
very funny poems and stories.
We are going to publish new Betty MacDonald essays on Betty MacDonald's gardens and nature in Washington State. Tell us the names of this mysterious couple please and you can win a very new Betty MacDonald documentary.
The series premiered on September 3,
1951, the same day as "Search for Tomorrow," and ended on August 1,
1952.
Although it did well in the ratings, it had difficulty
attracting a steady sponsor. This episode features Betty Lynn (later
known for her work on "The Andy Griffith Show") as Betty MacDonald, John
Craven as Bob MacDonald, Doris Rich as Ma Kettle, and Frank Twedell as
Pa Kettle.
Betty MacDonald fan club exhibition will be fascinating with the international book editions and letters by Betty MacDonald. I can't wait to see the new Betty MacDonald documentary.
The Senate Democrats' sound and fury over
President Donald Trump's cabinet picks and his political agenda is
apparently signifying nothing – at least on defense policy. The fact
that the Senate quickly confirmed General James "Mad Dog" Mattis by a
vote of 98-1
late Friday afternoon in the wake of inauguration activities shows that
even progressive Democrats, such as Sens. Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth
Warren, don't have the stomach for a foreign policy fight with Trump's
new Pentagon. That's how effectively Trump and perhaps even Mattis'
defense industry connections are already bullying Washington into submission.
Sanders justified his vote by saying
that while Mattis wasn't the nominee he preferred, "in a Trump cabinet
likely to be loaded up with right-wing extremists, all of whom I will
oppose, I hope General Mattis will have a moderating influence on some
of the racist and xenophobic views that President Trump advocated
throughout the campaign." This is incredibly wishful and relativistic
thinking. Mattis will never be a moderating influence, and he's already
exhibited racist and xenophobic thinking by the ways in which he views
the adversary.
The Pentagon's new secretary of defense believes, and is on record
saying, that we should "have a plan to kill everybody you meet," that
"if you f*ck with me, I'll kill you all," and that "there are some
assholes in the world that just need to be shot".
Bombastic braggadocios aren't helpful at the
Pentagon helm. This language may serve a purpose within the defense
industry, as it props up their for-profit modus operandi. But in terms
of aiding international affairs, it's caustic and antagonistic and will
only get us into more wars, not fewer.
Mattis, moreover, thinks that shooting people is
"just business" and that it's "a hell of a lot of fun to shoot them."
This is exactly the kind of attitude that leads to U.S. Marines
urinating on dead Afghan bodies. When our new defense secretary says
that killing is "a hell of a hoot," and that "It's fun to shoot some
people," we are inculcating a culture of indiscriminate violence. This
is not level-headed and will undoubtedly lead to more trickle-down
killing and callousness.
This is also not emblematic of cooler heads
capable of prevailing amid the myriad precipitous, conflict-ridden
cliffs that we will invariably face in a Trump foreign policy agenda.
Yet, every single Democrat in the Senate – with the exception of New
York Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand – voted to send that message to the world.
What a lost opportunity to send a different message.
What's most frustrating here, however, is that
this problem – of progressives rolling over to more militaristic foreign
policy players in Washington – is prevalent within the progressive
policy community. It's also what plagued Sanders' presidential campaign.
Many progressive policymakers don't have sufficient foreign policy
experience to competently push back when questioned about a violent
conflict overseas. They've largely not spent time in conflict zones
without military escort, which is part of the problem, of course, as
Pentagon protection offers an extremely selective and ultimately biased
perspective. Nor have they prioritized meetings with community-based
organizations in Somalia, Afghanistan, Iraq, Yemen, Libya, Syria or
Pakistan, that are cleaning up after the death and destruction from our
drone strikes, airstrikes, ground raids and weapons trafficking.
General James Mattis will have the chance to practice what he preaches on nuclear weapons.
This is a serious and serial problem.
Progressive Democrats often get elected to Congress after years of local
and state service on legislatures, county and school boards, and
commissions, but arrive in Washington with little foreign service or
foreign policy expertise of any kind. They haven't seen for themselves –
and our mainstream media are rarely showing – the disastrous wake left
behind by our military invasions. And they often can't properly
pronounce a foreign or adversary's town, tribe, territory or tactic in a
debate, getting trounced by more militarily minded opponents.
This happens over and over and over again. And
it was very visible in debates between Sanders and Hillary Clinton. She
was clearly perceived as the security expert, even if it came with email
blunders, because she had exposure while at the State Department to the
language, the lexicon and the litany of defense apparatuses that are
useful to presidential debate.
It's high time progressives in Congress –
elected officials and their senior staff – get over to places like Bayda
province in Yemen, where the Trump administration's first drone strikes occurred over the weekend, Somalia's Galmudug region, where the U.S. killed
nearly two dozen government soldiers in September, and anywhere in
Afghanistan, where the U.S. under the Obama administration increased air
strikes by 40 percent
in 2016. And insist to see it with the assistance and collaboration of
local actors and international aid and relief organizations.
Then, progressive members of Congress might be
able to go toe-to-toe with the Mattises of this world. Until then,
progressives have no fighting chance on the foreign policy front.
Michael Shank teaches sustainable development at New York
University’s Center for Global Affairs and served as a senior policy
adviser to U.S. Rep. Michael Honda between 2009-2013.
Donald Trump has echoed North Korea’s leader, Kim Jong-un,
after declaring that the day of his inauguration should be a “national
day of patriotic devotion” – a rallying cry that would not be out of
place in the secretive state’s propaganda. Trump’s proclamation, which was made official on Monday,
has been uttered by Kim in speeches to his 1.2 million-strong military
and members of the ruling Korean Workers’ party in recent years.
In an address to a military parade in Pyongyang
on 10 October 2015 – the party’s 70th anniversary – Kim thanked the
“heroic men and women” of the army and security services who, “in hearty
response to the party’s appeal, have worked with patriotic devotion and
created one heroic miracle after another” in their quest to build a
“thriving socialist nation”.The phrase also crops up in North Korean propaganda. On 19 December last year, the fifth anniversary of the death of Kim’s father, Kim Jong-il,
the Rodong Sinmun, the ruling party’s official newspaper, said of the
late leader: “The noble image and patriotic devotion of the peerless
patriot, who reliably defended socialism centred on the popular masses
and turned [North Korea] into an invincible politico-ideological power
and a world military power.” In an article just after Kim’s death,
the official KCNA news agency cited meteorologists as saying “the
spring of prosperity under socialism will surely come … thanks to the
patriotic devotion of Kim Jong-il, who blocked the howling wind of
history till the last moments of his life”. And last January, the Rodong Sinmun cited a speech in which Kim
Jong-un had congratulated a socialist youth league formed in the name of
his grandfather and North Korea’s founder, Kim Il-sung, on its 70th anniversary. Kim, according to the paper, said the league had enjoyed “a history
of brilliant victories of the great leaders’ original idea of
prioritising the youth and their wise leadership and a history of ardent
loyalty and patriotic devotion, with which the young people of Korea
have supported the party and the leader, the country and the people”. Trump’s use of the term, and its provenance, was noted on Twitter.
In his inaugural speech, Trump declared that he would put “America
first” and argued that patriotic zeal could heal the nation’s divisions.On Monday, paperwork was filed with the federal government declaring that the day of his inauguration, 20 January 2017, would be officially known as the “National Day of Patriotic Devotion”. Trump’s executive order said the proclamation would “strengthen our
bonds to each other and to our country – and to renew the duties of
government to the people”. Jiro Ishimaru of Asia Press,
an Osaka-based organisation with a network of high-level contacts in
North Korea, said that by invoking patriotic devotion, Trump appeared to
be channeling three generations of North Korea’s Kim dynasty.
Trump’s inaugural speech in full“Ordinary North Koreans hear those words every day,” Ishimaru told
the Guardian. “They don’t just appear in the media and speeches, but on
posters and in other propaganda. They hear the word patriotism at local
residents’ meetings, where, for example, they’re told to produce more
rice out of love for their country, or to collect more scrap metal for
weapons and bullets.”It is not unusual for incoming US presidents to draw on their
political and philosophical beliefs when, as is customary, they give a
new name to inauguration day. Barack Obama called his first
inauguration, in 2009, a National Day of Renewal and Reconciliation;
eight years earlier, George W Bush began his first term by declaring the
date a National Day of Prayer and Thanksgiving. Ishimaru said most ordinary North Koreans were barely aware that the
US had a new president. The Rodong Sinmun reported the inauguration in a
brief article, without comment, at the bottom of the newspaper’s back
page on Sunday, two days after it took place. “I talk to North Koreans every day, and Trump’s inauguration has
barely registered with them,” he said. “Life is extremely tough, so they
are too busy concentrating on their own problems to think about US
politics.”
Since you’re here…
…we
have a small favour to ask. More people are reading the Guardian than
ever but far fewer are paying for it. And advertising revenues across
the media are falling fast. So you can see why we need to ask for your
help. The Guardian's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot
of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe
our perspective matters – because it might well be your perspective,
too.
If everyone who reads our reporting, who likes it, helps to pay for it, our future would be much more secure.
Protesters walk during the Women’s
March on Washington, with the U.S. Capitol in the background, on January
21, 2017 in Washington, D.C.
Mario Tama, Getty Images
Last Updated Jan 22, 2017 1:33 PM EST
President
Donald Trump, in between tweets about his “long standing ovations” at
CIA headquarters and his inauguration’s television ratings, implied in a
tweet early Sunday morning that the Women’s March protesters did not vote. “Watched
protests yesterday but was under the impression that we just had an
election!” Mr. Trump wrote. “Why didn’t these people vote? Celebs hurt
cause badly.”
However, shortly after posting that first tweet, he added that he respects Americans’ right to protest:
She denounced the “vulgar” comments from some at the Women’s
March on Washington, saying there was no need for such “negative”
comments. “You had profanity-laced, vulgar comments coming from
celebrities,” she said. “Donald Trump in his inaugural address talked
about the forgotten man, now these forgotten celebrities came to
Washington to deliver really negative messages.” The gender gap in the election
was large: Mr. Trump beat Clinton by 53 percent to 41 percent among
men, while Clinton won among women by 54 percent to 42 percent. The
gender breakdown among white voters was different, however: Mr. Trump
beat Clinton among white women 53 percent to 43 percent. The
Women’s March featured millions of protesters in cities across the
country rallying against President Trump’s stated agenda, with the
primary protest being a large rally in Washington, D.C. Many protesters
wore pointy-eared “pussyhats,” carried signs protesting various aspects
of the new administration’s plans, and chanted, “Welcome to your first
day, we will never go away.”
It’s not clear which of the many celebrities to speak at the Women’s March
President Trump was referring to in his tweet, but Madonna’s fiery,
profanity-laced speech has since drawn the most attention online. “I’m
angry,” Madonna stated at one point, pointing to her chest. “Yes, I am
outraged. Yes, I have thought an awful lot about blowing up the White
House.” In addition to tweeting about the Women’s March protesters, Mr. Trump also weighed in on his visit to CIA headquarters on Saturday afternoon.
While standing in front of the CIA’s memorial to fallen
officers, the president tried to reassure the intelligence community he
was still behind them after a series of disparaging remarks. He also
talked about his anger with the media for its coverage of the crowd size
at his inauguration. Recently-departed CIA Director John Brennan
issued a blistering statement about Mr. Trump’s appearance shortly
afterwards, slamming what he described as the president’s
self-aggrandizement in front of the memorial to our nation’s fallen
intelligence officers. The president, however, had a different
take in a tweet on Sunday, focusing instead on the “long standing
ovations” he received in Langley, Virginia, and calling the overall
event a “WIN!”
WASHINGTON
— The day after what many had assumed would be the inauguration of the
first female president, hundreds of thousands of women flooded the
streets of Washington, and many more marched in cities across the
country, in defiant, jubilant rallies against the man who defeated her.
Protesters
jammed the streets near the Capitol for the main demonstration, packed
so tightly at times that they could barely move. In Chicago, the size of
a rally so quickly outgrew early estimates that the official march that
was scheduled to follow was canceled for safety, though many paraded
through downtown, anyway.
In
Manhattan, Fifth Avenue became a tide of signs and symbolic pink hats,
while in downtown Los Angeles, shouts of “love trumps hate” echoed along
a one-mile route leading to City Hall, with many demonstrators spilling
over into adjacent streets in a huge, festival-like atmosphere.
The
marches were the kickoff for what their leaders hope will be a
sustained campaign of protest in a polarized nation, riven by an
election that raised unsettling questions about American values,
out-of-touch elites and barriers to women’s ambitions.
Hundreds of thousands of women came
out to march in Washington, D.C. There were also hundreds of solidarity
marches held around the nation and the world.
By NEETI UPADHYE on Publish Date January 21, 2017.
On successive days, two parallel and separate Americas were on display in virtually the same location. First there was President Trump’s inauguration,
his message of an ailing society he would restore to greatness aimed at
the triumphant supporters who thronged Washington on Friday.
Then
on Saturday, in what amounted to a counterinauguration, the speakers,
performers and marchers proclaimed allegiance to a profoundly different
vision of the nation. They voiced determination to protect an array of
rights that they believe Mr. Trump threatens, and that they thought only
recently were secure.
“Thank
you for understanding that sometimes we must put our bodies where our
beliefs are,” Gloria Steinem, the feminist icon and an honorary
chairwoman of the march, told those gathered in Washington. “Pressing
‘send’ is not enough.”
To mobilize a progressive movement reeling from Hillary Clinton’s defeat, organizers broadened the platform
beyond longstanding women’s issues such as abortion, equal pay and
sexual assault to include immigrant rights, police brutality, mass
incarceration, voter suppression and environmental protection.
Protesters at the women’s march in Paris on Saturday.Credit
Jacky Naegelen/Reuters
But the march’s origins were in the outrage and despair of many women after an election that placed gender in the spotlight as never before.
Mrs.
Clinton assertively claimed the mantle of history, offering herself as
the champion of women and families, and calling out her opponent for boasting of forcing himself on women
in a recording that prompted a national conversation about sexual
assault. In a sly allusion to the crude remarks Mr. Trump made on the
tape, many marchers, women and men alike, wore pink “pussy hats”
sporting cat ears.
In
Washington, demonstrators old and young pushed strollers and hoisted
children onto their shoulders or guided elderly parents through the
milling crowds. They waved handmade signs: “Hate Does Not Make America
Great,” “I Will Not Go Back Quietly to the 1950s” and “I’m 17 — Fear
Me!” They chanted, “This is what democracy looks like.’”
Emma
Wendt, 13, came with a large group of family members and schoolmates
from Kensington, Md., for a simple reason: “being part of history.”
The
marchers were confronting a president who has appointed just a handful
of women to his cabinet and inner circle, and who has pledged to
nominate a Supreme Court justice who opposes abortion rights and to
dismantle a health care act that covers contraception. His appointees
have track records of voting to cut funding for anti-domestic violence
programs, opposing increases in the minimum wage and restructuring Medicaid — moves that disproportionately affect women and minorities.
Crowd
estimates were not available in some locations, but a city official in
Washington said that participation there likely surpassed half a
million, according to The Associated Press. Added to the more than
400,000 that Mayor Bill de Blasio’s office said had marched in New York
City, hundreds of thousands more in Chicago and Los Angeles, and those
who showed up at many other marches nationwide, the total attendance
easily surpassed one million in the United States. Marches also took
place in a number of cities abroad, including Berlin, Paris, Rome,
Amsterdam and Cape Town.
In
Boston, where the crowd swelled to 175,000, Senator Elizabeth Warren
looked out at the admiring throngs and conjured up the image of Mr.
Trump’s being sworn in the day before.
“The sight is now burned into my eyes forever,” Ms. Warren said, adding, “We will use that vision to fight harder.”
Yet
women did not protest — or vote — as a bloc. About 53 percent of white
women voted for Mr. Trump, according to exit polls, and many said his
demeaning comments about women mattered less to them than their belief
that he had the independence and business experience to bring about
change, restore well-paying jobs and protect America’s borders.
“The
women’s march clearly doesn’t represent all women,” Alex Smith, the
national chairwoman of the College Republicans, said in an email. She
noted the exclusion of anti-abortion women’s groups from the event. “It is precisely this type of dogmatic intransigence that voters rejected.”
The
marches came a day after confrontations between anti-Trump protesters
and the police led to more than 200 arrests in Washington. But
Saturday’s demonstrations were peaceful, and counterprotests were few.
In St. Paul, one man was arrested after marchers reported he had
“sprayed irritants” into the crowd, the police said.
By
midafternoon, the target of the protests had not said anything about
the marchers, verbally or on Twitter. Though the Washington march ended
within sight of the White House, and some demonstrators passed by his
recently opened hotel, Mr. Trump did not cross paths with the crowd.
A woman wore a United States flag as a hijab during a protest in front of the Brandenburg Gate in Berlin.Credit
Gregor Fischer/DPA, via Agence France-Presse — Getty Images
The
march had strong echoes of Mrs. Clinton’s campaign events, with some of
the celebrities, performers and slogans. Madonna, who gave a speech,
said toward the end of it: “I have thought a lot about blowing up the
White House. But I know that this will not change anything.” (The Secret
Service declined to comment on the remark, though an investigation
seemed unlikely.)
After
attending the inauguration on Friday, Mrs. Clinton herself was not seen
at the march. She did, however, acknowledge the moment on Twitter.
“Thanks for standing, speaking & marching for our values @womensmarch,” she wrote.
The
marches captured the potential and the perils for the progressive
movement — whether it can frame its message to appeal to new generations
and whether it can translate protests into action locally and
nationally.
Plans
for Saturday’s march in Washington began as Facebook posts just after
the election by a retired lawyer in Hawaii and a fashion designer in New
York, both of whom are white and had no experience organizing protests.
Soon, protests flooded the feeds urging them to diversify. In the end, a triumvirate of African-American, Latina and Muslim women joined the leadership team.
In a sly allusion to crude remarks made by Mr. Trump about sexual assault, many marchers wore hats sporting cat ears.Credit
Hilary Swift for The New York Times
The
march’s initial struggles echoed broader debates in the movement about
whether the courting of new demographic groups alienated the white
working-class voters who had carried Mr. Trump to victory, or whether
white women had betrayed gender solidarity by voting for him. Yet on
Saturday, these tensions did not deter a multiracial, multigenerational
turnout. Mothers marched with daughters and granddaughters; whole
families, including husbands and sons, marched arm in arm.
Mikhael
Tara Garver, 37, of Brooklyn, who marched with her mother, recalled how
her family had reacted after the election: “We were all calling my
great-aunts because we all knew how important Hillary was to them and
how important surviving to see that moment was for them.”
Another
family came from Baltimore. “We have to get away from fear,” said
Lureen Grace Wiggins, 49. Her daughter, Eden, 17, was exhilarated by the
size of the crowd: “When you’re out here and people see you, they know
you care.”
The
march was rich in historical allusions — most deliberately, the 1963
march led by the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. But it echoed many
other marches, including those in the 1970s that brought hundreds of
thousands of women to the streets championing an Equal Rights Amendment
that was ultimately defeated, and those from the late 1990s and on for
abortion rights, culminating in a 2004 March for Women’s Lives that
organizers said drew more than one million to the capital.
Saturday’s
march happened to come just six days before quite a different one: the
annual March for Life by opponents of abortion.
But
perhaps the most apt analogy, said Ellen Fitzpatrick, the author of
“The Highest Glass Ceiling,” was to the 1913 suffragists’ march on
Washington, timed to coincide with the inauguration of President Woodrow
Wilson. Led by the renowned suffragist Alice Paul, it featured a
lawyer, Inez Milholland, riding a white horse down Pennsylvania Avenue,
with 24 floats, nine marching bands and luminaries like Helen Keller.
The women were hooted and jeered at and roughed up by the police,
prompting congressional hearings and generating public sympathy. They
won the vote seven years later.
Faye
Wattleton, the former president of Planned Parenthood, said that women
have always had to regroup, even after they thought battles were won.
“This is not new,” she said. “We have to go back to the battlefield and
re-fight the wars against women.”
Correction: January 21, 2017 An earlier version of this article misstated the surname of
the author of “The Highest Glass Ceiling.” It is Fitzpatrick, not
Fitzgerald.
Reporting was contributed by
Farah Stockman from Washington, Julie Turkewitz from Denver, Jess
Bidgood from Boston, Emma G. Fitzsimmons and Anemona Hartocollis from
New York, Mitch Smith from Chicago, Christina Capecchi from St. Paul and
Jennifer Medina from Los Angeles.
A version of this article appears in print on January 22, 2017, on Page A1 of the New York edition with the headline: Defiant Yet Jubilant Voices Flood U.S. Cities. Order Reprints|Today's Paper|Subscribe
On 'SNL' even Putin makes fun of Trump's Inauguration crowds
Kelly Lawler , USA TODAY
12:22 a.m. ET Jan. 22, 2017
3.7k Shares
The day after Donald Trump was inaugurated as the 45th President of the United States, Saturday Night Live opened
not with Alec Baldwin's lip-pursing impression of Trump, but with a
shirtless Beck Bennett as Russian President Vladimir Putin, addressing
the American people.
"Relax. I got this. Putin's going to make everything OK." After
joking that he wouldn't let anything bad happen to the United states
("it's the most expensive thing we've ever bought"), Bennett as Putin
addressed Donald Trump, bringing up the size of the Inauguration crowds,
which has already been a hot topic with Trump and his press secretary Sean Spicer. "I'm glad to see so many people turned up to your inauguration," he said, showing a photo of huge crowds in Washington, D.C.
"Oh wait, that's the Women's March!"
he cried as the audience cheered. "This is the inauguration," he added,
and the photo changed to the sparser crowds from Friday. See the clip
below. Also in the cold open, Kate McKinnon
showed up as a "happy" Russian woman, terrifyingly reading a prepared
statement about how great life is for women in Russia. Later in the
sketch she reappeared behind Putin, wearing the same pink hat many
donned during the Women's March.
Washington turned into a virtual fortress on Thursday ahead of Donald
Trump's presidential inauguration, while thousands of people took to the
streets of New York and Washington to express their displeasure with
his coming administration. Some
900,000 people, both Trump backers and opponents, are expected to flood
Washington for Friday's inauguration ceremony, according to organizers'
estimates. Events include the swearing-in ceremony on the steps of the
U.S. Capitol and a parade to the White House along streets thronged with
spectators.
The number of planned
protests and rallies this year is far above what has been typical at
recent presidential inaugurations, with some 30 permits granted in
Washington for anti-Trump rallies and sympathy protests planned in
cities from Boston to Los Angeles, and outside the U.S. in cities
including London and Sydney. The
night before the inauguration, thousands of people turned out in New
York for a rally at the Trump International Hotel and Tower, and then
marched a few blocks from the Trump Tower where the businessman lives. The
rally featured a lineup of politicians, activists and celebrities
including Mayor Bill de Blasio and actor Alec Baldwin, who trotted out
the Trump parody he performs on "Saturday Night Live." "Donald
Trump may control Washington, but we control our destiny as Americans,"
de Blasio said. "We don't fear the future. We think the future is
bright, if the people's voices are heard." In
Washington, a group made up of hundreds of protesters clashed with
police clad in riot gear who used pepper spray against some of the crowd
on Thursday night, according to footage on social media. The
confrontation occurred outside the National Press Club building, where
inside a so-called "DeploraBall" event was being held in support of
Trump, the footage showed. U.S.
Department of Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson said police aimed
to keep groups separate, using tactics similar to those employed during
last year's political conventions. "The
concern is some of these groups are pro-Trump, some of them are
con-Trump, and they may not play well together in the same space,"
Johnson said on MSNBC. Trump
opponents have been angered by his comments during the campaign about
women, illegal immigrants and Muslims and his pledges to scrap the
Obamacare health reform and build a wall on the Mexican border. The
Republican's supporters admire his experience in business, including as
a real estate developer and reality television star, and view him as an
outsider who will take a fresh approach to politics. Bikers
for Trump, a group that designated itself as security backup during
last summer's Republican National Convention in Cleveland, is ready to
step in if protesters block access to the inauguration, said Dennis
Egbert, one of the group's organizers. "We're
going to be backing up law enforcement. We're on the same page,"
Egbert, 63, a retired electrician from Harrisburg, Pennsylvania.
SECURITY CORDON
About 28,000 security
personnel, miles of fencing, roadblocks, street barricades and dump
trucks laden with sand are part of the security cordon around 3 square
miles (8 square km) of central Washington.
A
protest group known as Disrupt J20 has vowed to stage demonstrations at
each of 12 security checkpoints and block access to the festivities on
the grassy National Mall.
Police
and security officials have pledged repeatedly to guarantee protesters'
constitutional rights to free speech and peaceful assembly.
Aaron
Hyman, fellow at the National Gallery of Art, said he could feel
tension in the streets ahead of Trump's swearing-in and the heightened
security was part of it. "People
are watching each other like, 'You must be a Trump supporter,' and 'You
must be one of those liberals'," said Hyman, 32, who supported Democrat
Hillary Clinton in the November election. Friday's
crowds are expected to fall well short of the 2 million people who
attended Obama's first inauguration in 2009, and be in line with the 1
million who were at his second in 2013. Forecast
rain may also dampen the turnout, though security officials lifted an
earlier ban on umbrellas, saying small umbrellas would be permitted.
(Additional reporting by Susan Heavey and Doina Chiacu in Washigton,
Curtis Skinner in San Francisco, and Joseph Ax in New York; Editing by
Scott Malone, James Dalgleish and Lisa Shumaker)
"It
wasn't Donald Trump that divided this country, this country has been
divided for a long time!" Stated today by Reverend Franklin Graham.
Trump gets facts wrong in attacks against NBC's "Today" show
No, Donald Trump, NBC's "Today" show is not doing "badly."
It is actually America's highest-rated morning show among 25- to
54-year-olds, the key demographic for advertisers, and it is just
100,000 viewers behind ABC's "Good Morning America" among all viewers. The high-rated morning show attracted Trump's ire on Wednesday by broadcasting a report that cast doubt on his job-creating record. The report -- part of a new franchise called "Today's Fact Check" -- called Trump's impact "very small or non-existent." Trump called that assertion "fake news." "Ask top CEO's of those companies for real facts," he wrote, insisting that packages of jobs "came back because of me!"
The facts are much more complicated. As NBC, CNN and other news outlets
have reported, a number of big companies have announced
previously-planned investments in the United States in ways that allow
Trump to take credit.
"They have completely changed their P.R., many of these companies,"
CNN's Christine Romans said in a similar segment on "New Day" Wednesday
morning. "They want to de-emphasize their growth
overseas and they want to re-emphasize that, 'Hey, we've always been
growing here all along,'" she said. So, anchor Alisyn Camerota responded, "now they're touting it in a way they didn't a year ago."
Of course, it is in the president-elect's interest to take credit for
all job announcements. The pro-Trump web site Breitbart News has a
running list of announcements titled "TRUMP JOBS BOOM." The "Today" show report, by correspondent Ari Melber, said "companies are willing to deal with this as a P.R. issue," partly to avoid critical tweets from Trump.
Anchor Matt Lauer asked him: "If you had to rate the president-elect's
impact on job creation or job preservation, over the course of this two
month transition, how would you rate it?" "According
to the companies we hear from, it is very small or nonexistent," Melber
said. "There's a fantasy football aura to all this. Because Donald Trump
is saying things on the Internet, and then when companies do things,
he'll selectively respond to it." Trump responded to
the report a few minutes later with a series of tweets, including one
that read, "No wonder the Today Show on biased @NBC is doing so badly
compared to its glorious past. Little credibility!"
The comment amused staffers at both NBC and its arch-rival ABC. Why?
Because staffers at both networks follow the ratings race extremely
closely. "Today" is doing quite well, contrary to Trump's claims.
While Trump was tweeting, another morning show competitor, "Fox &
Friends" on Fox News, was airing an exclusive pre-taped interview with
him. NBC had no public response to Trump's criticisms, except to report on his tweets in the 8 a.m. hour of "Today." But the network's web site coincidentally had a related headline on Wednesday morning. "Americans to Trump: Enough With the Tweets,"
the headline said, citing a new NBC/Wall Street Journal poll. According
to the poll, 69% of Americans are wary of Trump's Twitter habit.
Trump said in an interview broadcast Wednesday morning on "Fox &
Friends" that he doesn't "like to tweet," but has to use the social
network to respond to the "dishonest media."
As president, Trump will have the option
of taking over the official @POTUS Twitter handle or maintaining his
own, @realDonaldTrump. With 20.1 million followers hanging on his every
missive compared with @POTUS’s 13.5 million, Trump has given no
indication he will make the switch.
Sean Spicer, the incoming White House press secretary, told CNN
earlier this month that Trump would “probably be tweeting from both, or
whatever he chooses”.Last week, BuzzFeed News publicised concerns
that Trump’s “shockingly insecure” personal Twitter account had no
known special security protections and was open to being exploited with
potentially devastating impacts for the stock market and geopolitical
stability.It would not be the first time Trump’s account has been hacked: in
2013, when he was best-known as a real estate tycoon and host of The
Apprentice TV show, someone reportedly gained access to his account
to tweet Lil Wayne lyrics (“These hoes think they classy, well that’s
the class I’m skippen”, from the remix of will.i.am and Britney Spear’s
Scream & Shout).“My Twitter has been seriously hacked --- and we are looking for the perpetrators,” Trump tweeted at the time.
Since you’re here…
…we
have a small favour to ask. More people are reading the Guardian than
ever but far fewer are paying for it. And advertising revenues across
the media are falling fast. So you can see why we need to ask for your
help. The Guardian's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot
of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe
our perspective matters – because it might well be your perspective,
too.
If everyone who reads our reporting, who likes it, helps to pay for it, our future would be much more secure.
As Trump Era Arrives, a Sense of Uncertainty Grips the World
President-elect Donald J.
Trump in the Trump Tower lobby on Monday. His remarks in a string of
interviews have escalated tensions with China and infuriated allies.Credit
Hilary Swift for The New York Times
LONDON — The Germans are angry. The Chinese are downright furious. Leaders of NATO are nervous, while their counterparts at the European Union are alarmed.
Just
days before he is sworn into office, President-elect Donald J. Trump
has again focused his penchant for unpredictable disruption on the rest
of the world. His remarks in a string of discursive and sometimes
contradictory interviews have escalated tensions with China while also infuriating allies and institutions critical to America’s traditional leadership of the West.
No one knows where exactly he is headed — except that the one country he is not criticizing is Russia and its president, Vladimir V. Putin. For now. And that he is an enthusiastic cheerleader of Brexit and an unaffiliated Britain. For now.
Mr.
Trump’s unpredictability is perhaps his most predictable
characteristic. The world is accustomed to his provocative Twitter
messages, but is less clear about whether his remarks represent
meaningful new policy guidelines, personal judgments or passing whims.
In the interviews, Mr. Trump described the European Union as “basically a
vehicle for Germany” and predicted that the bloc would probably see other countries follow Britain’s example and vote to leave.
Mr. Trump also said Germany’s chancellor, Angela Merkel, had made a “catastrophic mistake” in allowing refugees to pour into Europe.
The barrage of inflammatory comments
in joint interviews published Sunday and Monday in Britain and Germany
elicited alarm and outrage in Europe, even as Ms. Merkel dryly
characterized Mr. Trump’s positions as nothing new.
“They
have been known for a while — my positions are also known,” Ms. Merkel
said Monday in Berlin. “I think we Europeans have control of our
destiny.”
Her
clipped response came as officials and analysts struggled with how to
interpret Mr. Trump’s remarks, as well as how to react to them.
Some
argued that the president-elect’s words should be regarded as tactical,
intended merely to keep his options open. But nearly everyone agreed
that Mr. Trump had made trouble, especially in criticizing Ms. Merkel,
given her importance as a figure of stability in Europe and her campaign
for re-election later this year.
For
good measure, Mr. Trump had also infuriated China by using an interview
on Friday with The Wall Street Journal to again question China’s
longstanding One China policy. It holds that Taiwan is an inalienable
part of the mainland.
Chancellor Angela Merkel of
Germany in Berlin on Monday. Mr. Trump’s comments about her and how the
European Union is “basically a vehicle for Germany” have damaged Ms.
Merkel, who is running for re-election this year.Credit
Oliver Weiken/European Pressphoto Agency
On
Monday, China’s foreign ministry spokeswoman, Hua Chunying, said that
anyone trying to use the status of Taiwan for negotiations would be
“smashing their feet by lifting a rock” and would face broad and strong
opposition from the Chinese government and people, as well as the
international community. She added that “not everything in the world can
be bargained or traded off.”
The
English-language China Daily accused Mr. Trump on Monday of “playing
with fire,” saying that if Taiwan became up for negotiation, as Mr.
Trump suggested to The Journal, “Beijing will have no choice but to take
off the gloves.”
Mr.
Trump’s interviews in Europe have placed him right in the middle of the
Continent’s most contentious issues. His critique of German dominance
over the European Union is hardly a novel thought; many Europeans share
the same complaints. But what is startling is how an incoming American
president would make such a statement about a key ally and, in doing so,
give succor to populist parties seeking to shatter the European
political establishment.
In
the interview published Monday in the German newspaper Bild and The
Times of London, Mr. Trump also equated his trust of Ms. Merkel with his
trust for Mr. Putin.
“I
start off trusting both,” he said during the joint interview, which was
conducted inside his office in Trump Tower in New York, “but let’s see
how long that lasts. It may not last long at all.”
Certainly,
Mr. Trump knows how to give a provocative interview. He repeated past
criticisms that NATO is “obsolete” for supposedly not confronting
terrorism, only to quickly add that “with that being said, NATO is very
important to me.”
Mr.
Trump’s comments “are a direct assault on the liberal order we’ve built
since 1945 and a repudiation of the idea that the United States should
lead the West,” said R. Nicholas Burns, a former senior State Department
official and ambassador to NATO, who also advised the presidential
campaign of Hillary Clinton.
“To
say that NATO is obsolete, openly support the disintegration of the
E.U. and then denigrate Merkel and put her on a par with Putin is a
fundamental break with 70 years of American policy and strategic thought
supported by Republicans from Eisenhower to now,” said Mr. Burns, who
has served presidents of both parties. “NATO is the great power
differential between the United States and Russia, as our Asian
alliances are the power differential between us and China.”
Mr.
Trump’s remarks almost certainly rankled Europe’s two most powerful
leaders, Ms. Merkel and Prime Minister Theresa May of Britain. Mr.
Trump’s enthusiasm for Britain’s vote to leave the European Union, or
Brexit — if welcomed by British officials, in general terms — has put
considerably more pressure on Mrs. May. She is preparing to give a major speech on Tuesday
about her Brexit plans, even as Mr. Trump promised to give Britain a
quick and fair trade deal outside the European Union — a deal that
cannot take place for at least two years until Britain leaves the bloc.
Awkwardly
for her, one of the interviewers was Michael Gove, who strongly
supported Brexit and ran for the Conservative leadership against Mrs.
May, who immediately fired him from the cabinet. Mr. Trump’s first
meeting with a British politician was with another May adversary, Nigel
Farage, the former leader of the anti-Europe U.K. Independence Party, or
UKIP.
Ms.
Merkel, who is known for her sang-froid and pragmatism, shrugged off
Mr. Trump’s latest criticism, saying that what matters is what he does
in office. “I am waiting for the president to be sworn into office. That
is the way it is done,” she said. “And then, of course, I will work
with him together.”
A newsstand in London. Mr.
Trump’s enthusiasm for Britain’s vote to leave the European Union, or
Brexit, has put considerably more pressure on the British prime
minister, Theresa May.Credit
Facundo Arrizabalaga/European Pressphoto Agency
The
German foreign minister, Frank-Walter Steinmeier, was not so sanguine.
Mr. Trump’s comments had “caused astonishment and commotion, and I’m
sure not just in Brussels,” where he spoke on Monday before a monthly
meeting of European Union foreign ministers.
Mr.
Steinmeier said that he had just seen the NATO secretary general, Jens
Stoltenberg, and that there was continuing concern inside the military
alliance.
“First,
it goes against the statements of the nominated defense secretary a few
days ago,” Mr. Steinmeier said. “We have to see what it will yield in
terms of U.S. foreign policy. The same goes for the statements on trade
policy. We count on the U.S. to stick to its international obligations,
including in the World Trade Organization.”
Others
cautioned against taking Mr. Trump’s words literally, at least for now.
“I take all of this with a pinch of salt,” said Robin Niblett, the
director of Chatham House, the London-based research institution. “I
think Trump is trying to keep his options open and not be cornered by
simply standing up for existing policy positions.”
Mr.
Trump’s transition team will try to begin to smooth over some of the
tensions on Tuesday in Washington, where the group planning his
inauguration will host a black-tie dinner for members of the foreign
diplomatic corps to mingle with prospective cabinet members, leaders of
Congress and Vice President-elect Mike Pence.
President
Obama’s departing ambassador to Germany, John B. Emerson, has used a
series of exit interviews and speeches in recent days to urge the
Germans to stay calm, not to overinterpret Twitter posts or view them as
finished foreign policy. Mr. Emerson underscored that, while more
clarity was needed, there were signs that Mr. Trump did value NATO and
the promise of United States protection for European allies.
“It’s
a very crucial issue, not just for European security, but for American
security,” Mr. Emerson said. He noted that Mr. Trump “authorized
President Obama when he came here on his trip shortly after the two of
them met to reassure European partners of the full commitment to NATO.
Now, we need to see what that means.”
Yet Europe is staring at a potentially transformative political year,
with elections coming in the Netherlands, France and Germany, and
possibly in Italy. Victories by populist parties could destabilize the
European Union, and many European officials worry that Mr. Trump’s
attacks are damaging.
Martin
Schäfer, a spokesman for Mr. Steinmeier and the German Foreign
Ministry, flatly rejected Mr. Trump’s comment in the interview that the
European Union “is basically a vehicle for Germany.”
“Perhaps
in times such as these, when order is crumbling, it is more important
than ever that we want to, and must, stand together,” Mr. Schäfer said,
underlining the post-World War II German stance that only through the country’s role in a larger European alliance are peace and prosperity guaranteed.
Foreign
Minister Jean-Marc Ayrault of France said Mr. Trump’s comments were an
invitation to the bloc to stand united. “As is the case with Brexit,” he
said, “the best way of defending Europe, and that is the invitation Mr.
Trump has given to us, is to remain united as a bloc, not forgetting
that the strength of Europeans lies in their unity.”
The
British foreign secretary, Boris Johnson, who supported Brexit,
emphasized Mr. Trump’s warm comments on the Anglo-American relationship.
“I think it’s very good news that the U.S.A. wants to do a good free
trade deal with us and wants to do it very fast,” he said. “Clearly it
will have to be a deal that’s very much in the interests of both sides,
but I have no doubt it will be.”
byDavid MorganCBS NewsJanuary 15, 2017, 2:02 PM
Scottish paper describes Trump inauguration as return of “The Twilight Zone”
Satirists
and late-night comics have not spared President-elect Donald Trump --
and neither has a Scottish newspaper’s TV critic. Sunday Herald reviewer Damien Love’s writeup
for this Friday’s broadcast of the inauguration of the reality TV star
as the 45th President of the United States characterized the proceedings
as the return of “The Twilight Zone.” The satirical TV review has since gone viral:
President Trump: The Inauguration 4pm, BBC One/STV After
a long absence, The Twilight Zone returns with one of the ambitious,
expensive and controversial productions in broadcast history. Sci-fi
writers have dabbled often with alternative history stories – among the
most common is the “What if The Nazis Had Won The Second World War”
setting – but this huge interactive virtual reality project, which will
unfold on TV, in the press, and on Twitter over the next four years,
sets out to build an ongoing alternative present. The story
begins in a nightmarish version of 2017 in which huge sections of the US
electorate have somehow been duped into voting to make Donald Trump
president. It sounds far-fetched, and it is, but as it goes on it
becomes more and more chillingly plausible. Today’s feature-length
opener concentrates on the gaudy inauguration of President Trump, and
the stirrings of protest and despair surrounding the ceremony, while
pundits speculate gravely on what lies ahead. It’s a flawed piece, but a disturbing glimpse of the horrors we could stumble into, if we’re not careful.”
Twitter users praised the description as “brilliant,” and “genius,” and noted the paper’s “terrifying sense of humor.”
Rod Serling’s classic series, which aired on CBS from
1959-1964, and which has been shown in syndication ever since, was
renowned for presenting stories of science fiction, the supernatural and
the uncanny, often with a twist ending.
Eloquence is a trait valued by debate team coaches but not
necessarily needed for the White House. Though their supporters
will always defend them, George Washington and George W. Bush are just
two of many presidents considered poor public speakers — and there have
been many commanders in chief in the two centuries between them who were
not necessarily golden-tongued.Now, an academic paper has put some presidents and political candidates’ language on trial. “A Readability Analysis of Campaign Speeches From the 2016 US Presidential Campaign,”
released this week by Carnegie Mellon University, analyzed stump
speeches to measure their “readability” — the reading level of an
address, ranked from first grade to 12th grade. And, according to a summary from the university, the study found “most candidates using words and grammar typical of students in grades 6-8, though Donald Trump tends to lag behind the others.”The story was more complicated than “Donald Trump can’t talk good,”
however. First, the researchers needed a way to measure readability.“It is based on the observation that some words (and grammatical
structures) appear with greater frequency at one grade level than
another,” Maxine Eskenazi, a scientist in the university’s Language
Technologies Institute, and Elliot Schumacher, a graduate student, wrote.
“For example, we would expect that we could see the word ‘win’ fairly
frequently in third grade documents while the word ‘successful’ would be
more frequent in, say, seventh grade documents. We would not see
dependent clauses very often at the second grade level whereas they
would be quite frequent at the seventh grade level.”Then, they needed some speeches to analyze.“A database was collected containing documents from each of the
[then] five current presidential candidates: Ted Cruz (5), Hillary
Clinton (7), Marco Rubio (6), Bernie Sanders (6), Donald Trump (8),” the paper read.
“… They range from the declaration of candidacy speech to campaign
trail speeches to victory speeches to defeat speeches.” What about a
historical comparison? “We also analyzed the readability of Lincoln’s
Gettysburg Address … and a speech from Barack Obama, George W. Bush, Bill Clinton and Ronald Reagan,” the researchers wrote.The results showed that the level of our political discourse had deteriorated — partly because of Trump.?“Speeches by past presidents while on campaign and the Gettysburg Address were at least at the eighth grade level,” the paper read. “The candidates’ speeches mostly went from seventh grade level for Donald Trump to tenth grade level for Bernie Sanders.”The researchers also tried to measure “the degree to which the
candidate changes their choice of words from one speech to another.” The
result appeared to confirm the perception of Hillary Clinton as a
chameleon.?“[Change] could reflect an effort to take into account the different audiences
or circumstances (winning or concession speech in a state, for
example),” they wrote. “We can see that Hilary Clinton has the highest
standard deviation and so the biggest change of choice of words from one
speech to another, while Ted Cruz varies the least in his choices.”Up next was a look at politicians’ grammar. “We see that George W. Bush had the lowest level and Abraham Lincoln the highest,” the paper read. “Amongst the candidates, levels are between sixth and seventh grades except for Donald Trump (grade 5.7).” A summary of the study put this result in another light. The
linguistic top of the pops, it turned out, was the Gettysburg Address
— which came from the pen of a man with little formal schooling. “In terms of grammar, none of the presidents and presidential candidates could compare with Lincoln’s Gettysburg Address — an admittedly high standard, with grammar well above the 10th grade level,” the summary read. “The current candidates generally had scores between 6th and 7th grades, with Trump just below 6th grade level. President Bush scored at a 5th grade level.”
Vocabulary and Grammatical Comparison (Carnegie Mellon University)
The researchers, who used a measure of readability meant to account
for differences between written and spoken language, noted that
evaluating public speakers is not easy. “Assessing the readability of campaign speeches is a little tricky
because most measures are geared to the written word, yet text is very
different from the spoken word,” Eskenazi said in a statement. “When we speak, we usually use less structured language with shorter sentences.” Trump, for one, seems to intuit that many of his supporters are not grammarians.
World-famous author Stephen King took to Twitter today to
respond to Donald Trump’s Twitter tirade about actress Meryl Streep’s
criticisms last night at the Golden Globes.As he so often does, King nails exactly what is disturbing about
Trump’s hypersensitivity and the danger it presents to the American
people. To be the leader of the United States of America requires a
certain thickness of skin; a need to rise above slights real and
perceived in order to put the good of the country before your own ego.But Trump is incapable of ignoring even the pettiest of slights.The presidency of the United States is perhaps the most emotionally
taxing job in the world, and requires great personal strength and
conviction to properly execute. The well-being of millions of people lie
in the hands of the president, along with their very lives.Trump’s inability to let a perceived slight from an actress who
didn’t even call him out by name – and his insistent need to insult and
demean his critics – shows just how emotionally immature he is and how
unqualified he is to lead this nation.
Friday January 13, 2017
Donald Trump news conference 'clear attack on the free press'
President-elect Donald Trump refused to answer questions
from CNN at his first news conference, Jan 11, 2017, declaring the news
outlet as 'fake news.' (Evan Vucci/Associated Press)
On Jan. 11, U.S. president-elect Donald Trump held his first press conference in months. It was at this news conference Trump declared CNN as so-called "fake
news" and refused to take questions relating to the network's report on
unverified intelligence documents that suggests Russia has compromising
information on the president-elect. Some observers worry this move signals a presidency that is already
taking an authoritarian tone. And it has journalists having to explore
the best ways to cover the incoming U.S. administration. "This is a clear attack on the free press. It's violating every norm
and standard that we have in countries like the United States and
Canada," policy analystJasmin Mujanović tells The Current's Friday host Laura Lynch. "It's signaling that he intends to … fundamentally remake what it means to live in a republic of laws in the United States."
Trump on fake news0:45
Mujanović says for observers and reporters of authoritarianism, Trump's behaviour sounds off all kinds of alarm bells. "I don't think it's an accident that some of the most prescient
analysis and critique that has come out over the last year year and a
half has been from people who have studied authoritarianism, you know in
the Middle East and Eastern Europe etc." He tells Lynch that Trump normalizing lying on public record as a
means of public policy and as a means of governance as well as
normalizing fringe extreme movements, "are all incredible blaring red
flags." Political columnist Susan Delacourttakes
issue with journalists in that news conference telling Lynch "they were
egging [Trump] on and trying to get him to say something scandalous." "It was kind of a dereliction of duty on the part of the media I thought."
Trump's conduct at his recent news conference
is 'not becoming of someone who purports to be the leader of the free
world or at the very least the leader of a democratic republic,' says
policy analyst Jasmin Mujanović. (Seth Wenig/Associated Press)
Delacourt says when politicians see the role of media as a marketing
or advertising tool and not a public service, there's a problem. "Donald Trump is a marketer. He's a businessman and he thinks that
the media is there primarily to help him do his job and when it doesn't
he's you know 'you're fired' or 'you're fake news' or he can shout them
down." "The problem is is that the line between using the media for that
purpose and then just discounting them altogether is it can be easily
breached." When it comes to holding Trump to account, Mujanović has little faith the media can make that happen. "I don't want that to be interpreted as an attack on the media. I
have colleagues who work in journalism. I just think that the issue is
that reporters in the United States and Canada and large parts of Europe
really have no first-hand experience with authoritarianism so to them
this is this is entertainment. This is a circus." Delacourt's advice to the Washington press corporations over the next four years: "Don't allow yourself to be played off each other. Hang together." "And remember that your job is a public service that sometimes
competition between the media is not as important as the public service —
a democratic rule of the media." Listen to the full conversation at the top of this web post. This segment was produced by The Current's Pacinthe Mattar, Ines Colabrese and Sujata Berry.
How a Sensational, Unverified Dossier Became a Crisis for Donald Trump
WASHINGTON
— Seven months ago, a respected former British spy named Christopher
Steele won a contract to build a file on Donald J. Trump’s ties to
Russia. Last week, the explosive details — unsubstantiated accounts of
frolics with prostitutes, real estate deals that were intended as bribes
and coordination with Russian intelligence of the hacking of Democrats —
were summarized for Mr. Trump in an appendix to a top-secret intelligence report.
The
consequences have been incalculable and will play out long past
Inauguration Day. Word of the summary, which was also given to President
Obama and congressional leaders, leaked to CNN Tuesday, and the rest of
the media followed with sensational reports.
Mr.
Trump denounced the unproven claims Wednesday as a fabrication, a
Nazi-style smear concocted by “sick people.” It has further undermined
his relationship with the intelligence agencies and cast a shadow over
the new administration.
Late
Wednesday night, after speaking with Mr. Trump, James R. Clapper Jr.,
the director of national intelligence, issued a statement decrying leaks
about the matter and saying of Mr. Steele’s dossier that the
intelligence agencies have “not made any judgment that the information
in this document is reliable.” Mr. Clapper suggested that intelligence
officials had nonetheless shared it to give policy makers “the fullest
possible picture of any matters that might affect national security.”
Parts
of the story remain out of reach — most critically the basic question
of how much, if anything, in the dossier is true. But it is possible to
piece together a rough narrative of what led to the current crisis,
including lingering questions about the ties binding Mr. Trump and his
team to Russia. The episode also offers a glimpse of the hidden side of
presidential campaigns, involving private sleuths-for-hire looking for
the worst they can find about the next American leader.
The
story began in September 2015, when a wealthy Republican donor who
strongly opposed Mr. Trump put up the money to hire a Washington
research firm run by former journalists, Fusion GPS, to compile a
dossier about the real estate magnate’s past scandals and weaknesses,
according to a person familiar with the effort. The person described the
opposition research work on condition of anonymity, citing the volatile
nature of the story and the likelihood of future legal disputes. The
identity of the donor is unclear.
Fusion
GPS, headed by a former Wall Street Journal journalist known for his
dogged reporting, Glenn Simpson, most often works for business clients.
But in presidential elections, the firm is sometimes hired by
candidates, party organizations or donors to do political “oppo” work —
shorthand for opposition research — on the side.
It
is routine work and ordinarily involves creating a big, searchable
database of public information: past news reports, documents from
lawsuits and other relevant data. For months, Fusion GPS gathered the
documents and put together the files from Mr. Trump’s past in business
and entertainment, a rich target.
After
Mr. Trump emerged as the presumptive nominee in the spring, the
Republican interest in financing the effort ended. But Democratic
supporters of Hillary Clinton were very interested, and Fusion GPS kept
doing the same deep dives, but on behalf of new clients.
In June, the tenor of the effort suddenly changed. The Washington Post reported that the Democratic National Committee had been hacked, apparently by Russian government agents, and a mysterious figure calling himself “Guccifer 2.0” began to publish the stolen documents online.
Mr.
Simpson hired Mr. Steele, a former British intelligence officer with
whom he had worked before. Mr. Steele, in his early 50s, had served
undercover in Moscow in the early 1990s and later was the top expert on
Russia at the London headquarters of Britain’s spy service, MI6. When he
stepped down in 2009, he started his own commercial intelligence firm,
Orbis Business Intelligence.
The
former journalist and the former spy, according to people who know
them, had similarly dark views of President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia,
a former K.G.B. officer, and the varied tactics he and his intelligence
operatives used to smear, blackmail or bribe their targets.
As
a former spy who had carried out espionage inside Russia, Mr. Steele
was in no position to travel to Moscow to study Mr. Trump’s connections
there. Instead, he hired native Russian speakers to call informants
inside Russia and made surreptitious contact with his own connections in
the country as well.
Mr.
Steele wrote up his findings in a series of memos, each a few pages
long, that he began to deliver to Fusion GPS in June and continued at
least until December. By then, the election was over, and neither Mr.
Steele nor Mr. Simpson was being paid by a client, but they did not stop
what they believed to be very important work. (Mr. Simpson declined to
comment for this article, and Mr. Steele did not immediately reply to a
request for comment.)
The
memos described two different Russian operations. The first was a
yearslong effort to find a way to influence Mr. Trump, perhaps because
he had contacts with Russian oligarchs whom Mr. Putin wanted to keep
track of. According to Mr. Steele’s memos, it used an array of familiar
tactics: the gathering of “kompromat,” compromising material such as
alleged tapes of Mr. Trump with prostitutes in a Moscow hotel, and
proposals for business deals attractive to Mr. Trump.
The
goal would probably never have been to make Mr. Trump a knowing agent
of Russia, but to make him a source who might provide information to
friendly Russian contacts. But if Mr. Putin and his agents wanted to
entangle Mr. Trump using business deals, they did not do it very
successfully. Mr. Trump has said he has no major properties there,
though one of his sons said at a real estate conference in 2008 that “a
lot of money” was “pouring in from Russia.”
The
second Russian operation described was recent: a series of contacts
with Mr. Trump’s representatives during the campaign, in part to discuss
the hacking of the Democratic National Committee and Mrs. Clinton’s
campaign chairman, John D. Podesta. According to Mr. Steele’s sources,
it involved, among other things, a late-summer meeting in Prague between
Michael Cohen, a lawyer for Mr. Trump, and Oleg Solodukhin, a Russian
official who works for Rossotrudnichestvo, an organization that promotes
Russia’s interests abroad.
By
all accounts, Mr. Steele has an excellent reputation with American and
British intelligence colleagues and had done work for the F.B.I. on the
investigation of bribery at FIFA, soccer’s global governing body.
Colleagues say he was acutely aware of the danger he and his associates
were being fed Russian disinformation. Russian intelligence had mounted a
complex hacking operation to damage Mrs. Clinton, and a similar
operation against Mr. Trump was possible.
But
much of what he was told, and passed on to Fusion GPS, was very
difficult to check. And some of the claims that can be checked seem
problematic. Mr. Cohen, for instance, said on Twitter on Tuesday night that he has never been in Prague; Mr. Solodukhin, his purported Russian contact, denied in a telephone interview
that he had ever met Mr. Cohen or anyone associated with Mr. Trump. The
president-elect on Wednesday cited news reports that a different
Michael Cohen with no Trump ties may have visited Prague and that the
two Cohens might have been mixed up in Mr. Steele’s reports.
But
word of a dossier had begun to spread through political circles. Rick
Wilson, a Republican political operative who was working for a super PAC
supporting Marco Rubio, said he heard about it in July, when an
investigative reporter for a major news network called him to ask what
he knew.
By
early fall, some of Mr. Steele’s memos had been given to the F.B.I.,
which was already investigating Mr. Trump’s Russian ties, and to
journalists. An MI6 official, whose job does not permit him to be quoted
by name, said that in late summer or early fall, Mr. Steele also passed
the reports he had prepared on Mr. Trump and Russia to British
intelligence. Mr. Steele was concerned about what he was hearing about
Mr. Trump, and he thought that the information should not be solely in
the hands of people looking to win a political contest.
After
the election, the memos, still being supplemented by his inquiries,
became one of Washington’s worst-kept secrets, as reporters — including
from The New York Times — scrambled to confirm or disprove them.
Word
also reached Capitol Hill. Senator John McCain, Republican of Arizona,
heard about the dossier and obtained a copy in December from David J.
Kramer, a former top State Department official who works for the McCain
Institute at Arizona State University. Mr. McCain passed the information
to James B. Comey, the F.B.I. director.
Remarkably
for Washington, many reporters for competing news organizations had the
salacious and damning memos, but they did not leak, because their
contents could not be confirmed. (Mother Jones magazine was an
exception, publishing a story on Oct. 31
that described the dossier, its origin and significance, while omitting
the titillating details.) That changed only this week, after the heads
of the C.I.A., the F.B.I. and the National Security Agency added a
summary of the memos, along with information gathered from other
intelligence sources, to their report on the Russian cyberattack on the
election.
Now,
after the most contentious of elections, Americans are divided and
confused about what to believe about the incoming president. And there
is no prospect soon for full clarity on the veracity of the claims made
against him.
“It is a remarkable moment in history,” said Mr. Wilson, the Florida political operative. “What world did I wake up in?”
Jonathan Martin, Mark Mazzetti and Eric Schmitt contributed reporting.
A version of this article appears in print on January 12, 2017, on Page A1 of the New York edition with the headline: How a Crisis Spilled Out of a Sensational, Unverified Dossier. Order Reprints|
McCain unloads on Putin during Mattis confirmation hearing: ‘He needs us as his enemy’
Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) unloaded on Russian President
Vladimir Putin Thursday during Defense Secretary-designate Gen. James
Mattis’ confirmation hearing. McCain, chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, said that,
under Putin, Russia has “invaded Ukraine, annexed Crimea, threatened
NATO allies, intervened militarily in Syria, leaving a trail of death
and destruction and broken promises in his wake.” “Russia’s military has targeted Syrian hospitals and first responders
with precision weapons,” McCain added. “Russia supplied the weapons
that shot down a commercial aircraft in Ukraine. Russia’s war on Ukraine
has killed thousands of Ukrainian soldiers and civilians.” The senator pointed out that Putin’s “disrespect for our nation” is
evidenced by Russia’s deliberate interference in the November election
through “cyber attacks and a disinformation campaign designed to weaken
America and discredit Western values.” McCain said that he has watched three presidents fail to improve
relations with Russia — and those failures were not due to “a lack of
good faith and effort on the U.S. side”: “Putin wants to be our enemy.
He needs us as his enemy. He will never be our partner, including in
fighting ISIL. He believes that strengthening Russia means weakening
America.” “We must proceed realistically on this basis,” McCain continued,
adding that the United States must display strength to any “adversary
that seeks to undermine our national interest and challenge the world
order.”
Thanks a Million, dear Letizia Mancino. You are an outstanding writer and artist.
We are so proud and happy to have you with us.
Letizia writes: One should not underestimate Wolfgang Hampel’s talent in speedily mobilizing Betty MacDonald’s friends.
We agree. Thank you so much dear Wolfgang Hampel for doing this. You founded Betty MacDonald Fan Club with four members.
Now we have members in 40 countries around the world. A dream came true.
Mary Holmes did an excellent job in translating this great story. Thank you so much dear Mary Holmes. We are really very grateful.
All the best to Letizia, Wolfgang and Mary and to all Betty MacDonald Fan Club fans from all over the world!
Lenard
Following in Betty’s footsteps in Seattle:
or some small talk with Betty
Copyright 2011/2016 by Letizia Mancino All rights reserved translated by Mary Holmes
We
were going to Canada in the summer. “When we are in Edmonton”, I said
to Christoph Cremer, “let’s make a quick trip to Seattle”. And that’s
how it happened. At Edmonton Airport we climbed into a plane and two
hours later we landed in the city where Betty had lived. I was so happy
to be in Seattle at last and to be able to trace Betty’s tracks!
Wolfgang Hampel had told Betty’s friends about our arrival. They
were happy to plan a small marathon through the town and it’s
surroundings with us. We only had a few days free. One should not
underestimate Wolfgang’s talent in speedily mobilizing Betty’s friends,
even though it was holiday time. E-mails flew backwards and forwards
between Heidelberg and Seattle, and soon a well prepared itinerary was
ready for us. Shortly before my departure Wolfgang handed me several
parcels, presents for Betty MacDonald's friends. I rushed to pack the
heavy gifts in my luggage but because of the extra weight had to throw
out a pair of pajamas!
After we had landed we took a taxi to the
Hotel in downtown Seattle. I was so curious to see everything. I
turned my head in all directions like one of the hungry hens from
Betty’s farm searching for food! Fortunately it was quite a short
journey otherwise I would have lost my head like a loose screw! Our
hotel room was on the 22nd floor and looked directly out onto the
16-lane highway. There might have been even more than 16 but it made me
too giddy to count! It was like a glimpse of hell! “And is this
Seattle?” I asked myself. I was horrified! The cars racing by were
enough to drive one mad. The traffic roared by day and night. We
immediately contacted Betty MacDonald's friends and let them know we had
arrived and they confirmed the times when we should see them.
On
the next morning I planned my first excursion tracing Betty’s tracks. I
spread out the map of Seattle. “Oh dear” I realized “the Olympic
Peninsula is much too far away for me to get there.” Betty nodded to me! “Very difficult, Letizia, without a car.”
“But I so much wanted to see your chicken farm”
“My chickens are no longer there and you can admire the mountains from a distance”
But
I wanted to go there. I left the hotel and walked to the waterfront
where the State Ferry terminal is. Mamma mia, the streets in Seattle are
so steep! I couldn’t prevent my feet from running down the hill. Why
hadn’t I asked for brakes to be fixed on my shoes? I looked at the
drivers. How incredibly good they must be to accelerate away from the
red traffic lights. The people were walking uphill towards me as briskly
as agile salmon. Good heavens, these Americans! I tried to keep my
balance. The force of gravity is relentless. I grasped hold of objects
where I could and staggered down. In Canada a friend had warned me that in Seattle I would see a lot of people with crutches.
Betty laughed. “ It’s not surprising, Letizia, walking salmon don’t fall directly into the soft mouth of a bear!” “ Betty, stop making these gruesome remarks. We are not in Firlands!”
I
went further. Like a small deranged ant at the foot of a palace monster
I came to a tunnel. The noise was unbearable. On the motorway, “The
Alaskan Way Viaduct”, cars, busses and trucks were driving at the speed
of light right over my head. They puffed out their poisonous gas into
the open balconies and cultivated terraces of the luxurious sky-
scrapers without a thought in the world. America! You are crazy! “Betty,
are all people in Seattle deaf? Or is it perhaps a privilege for
wealthy people to be able to enjoy having cars so near to their eyes and
noses to save them from boredom?”
“When the fog democratically allows everything to disappear into nothing, it makes a bit of a change, Letizia”
“ Your irony is incorrigible, Betty, but tell me, Seattle is meant to be a beautiful city, But where?” I had at last reached the State Ferry terminal.
“No
Madam, the ferry for Vashon Island doesn’t start from here,” one of the
men in the ticket office tells me. ”Take a buss and go to the ferry
terminal in West Seattle.” Betty explained to me “The island lies in
Puget Sound and not in Elliott Bay! It is opposite the airport. You must
have seen it when you were landing!” “Betty, when I am landing I shut my eyes and pray!”
It’s time for lunch. The weather is beautiful and warm. Who said to me that it always rains here? “Sure
to be some envious man who wanted to frighten you away from coming to
Seattle. The city is really beautiful, you’ll see. Stay by the
waterfront, choose the best restaurant with a view of Elliott Bay and
enjoy it.” “Thank you Betty!” I find a table on the
terrace of “Elliott’s Oyster House”. The view of the island is
wonderful. It lies quietly in the sun like a green fleecy cushion on the
blue water. Betty plays with my words: “Vashon Island is a big
cushion, even bigger than Bainbridge which you see in front of your
eyes, Letizia. The islands look similar. They have well kept houses and
beautiful gardens”.
I relax during this introduction, “Bainbridge” you are Vashon Island, and order a mineral water.
“At one time the hotel belonging to the parents of Monica Sone stood on the waterfront.” “Oh, of your friend Kimi!” Unfortunately I forget to ask Betty exactly where it was.
My mind wanders and I think of my mountain hike back to the hotel! “Why is there no donkey for tourists?” Betty laughs:
“I’m sure you can walk back to the hotel. “Letizia can do everything.””
“Yes, Betty, I am my own donkey!” But
I don’t remember that San Francisco is so steep. It doesn’t matter, I
sit and wait. The waiter comes and brings me the menu. I almost fall off
my chair! “ What, you have geoduck on the menu! I have to try it” (I
confess I hate the look of geoduck meat. Betty’s recipe with the pieces
made me feel quite sick – I must try Betty’s favourite dish!) “Proof that you love me!” said Betty enthusiastically “ Isn’t the way to the heart through the stomach?”
I order the geoduck. The waiter looks at me. He would have liked to recommend oysters. “Geoduck no good for you!” Had he perhaps read my deepest thoughts? Fate! Then no geoduck. “No good for me.” “Neither geoduck nor tuberculosis in Seattle” whispered Betty in my ear! “Oh Betty, my best friend, you take such good care of me!”
I order salmon with salad.
“Which salmon? Those that swim in water or those that run through Seattle?”
“Betty, I believe you want me to have a taste of your black humour.”
“Enjoy it then, Letizia.” During lunch we talked about tuberculosis, and that quite spoilt our appetite. “Have you read my book “The Plague and I”?”
“Oh Betty, I’ve started to read it twice but both times I felt so sad I had to stop again!”
“But
why?” asked Betty “Nearly everybody has tuberculosis! I recovered very
quickly and put on 20 pounds! There was no talk of me wasting away! What
did you think of my jokes in the book?”
“Those would have been a
good reason for choosing another sanitorium. I would have been afraid
of becoming a victim of your humour! You would have certainly given me a
nickname! You always thought up such amusing names!” Betty laughed.
“You’re
right. I would have called you “Roman nose”. I would have said to Urbi
and Orbi “ Early this morning “Roman nose” was brought here. She speaks
broken English, doesn’t eat geoduck but she does love cats.”
“Oh
Betty, I would have felt so ashamed to cough. To cough in your presence,
how embarrassing! You would have talked about how I coughed, how many
coughs!”
“It depends on that “how”, Letizia!”
“Please,
leave Goethe quotations out of it. You have certainly learnt from the
Indians how to differentiate between noises. It’s incredible how you
can distinguish between so many sorts of cough! At least 10!”
“So few?”
”And
also your descriptions of the patients and the nurses were pitiless. An
artistic revenge! The smallest pimple on their face didn’t escape your
notice! Amazing.”
“ I was also pitiless to myself. Don’t forget my irony against myself!”
Betty
was silent. She was thinking about Kimi, the “Princess” from Japan! No,
she had only written good things about her best friend, Monica Sone, in
her book “The Plague and I”. A deep friendship had started in the
hospital. The pearl that developed from the illness. “Isn’t it
wonderful, Betty, that an unknown seed can make its way into a mollusk
in the sea and develop into a beautiful jewel?” Betty is paying
attention.
“Betty, the friendship between you and Monica reminds
me of Goethe’s poem “Gingo-Biloba”. You must know it?” Betty nods and I
begin to recite it:
The leaf of this Eastern tree Which has been entrusted to my garden Offers a feast of secret significance, For the edification of the initiate.
Is it one living thing. That has become divided within itself? Are these two who have chosen each other, So that we know them as one?
The
friendship with Monica is like the wonderful gingo-biloba leaf, the
tree from the east. Betty was touched. There was a deep feeling of trust
between us. “Our friendship never broke up, partly because she was
in distress, endangered by the deadly illness. We understood and
supplemented each other. We were like one lung with two lobes, one from
the east and one from the west!” “A beautiful picture, Betty. You were like two red gingo-biloba leaves!”
Betty
was sad and said ” Monica, although Japanese, before she really knew me
felt she was also an American. But she was interned in America,
Letizia, during the second world war. Isn’t that terrible?”
“Betty,
I never knew her personally. I have only seen her on a video, but what
dignity in her face, and she speaks and moves so gracefully!”
“Fate could not change her”
“Yes, Betty, like the gingo-biloba tree in Hiroshima. It was the only tree that blossomed again after the atom bomb!”
The
bill came and I paid at once. In America one is urged away from the
table when one has finished eating. If one wants to go on chatting one
has to order something else. “That’s why all those people gossiping
at the tables are so fat!” Betty remarks. “Haven’t you seen how many
massively obese people walk around in the streets of America. Like
dustbins that have never been emptied!” With this typically
unsentimental remark Betty ended our conversation.
Ciao! I so
enjoyed the talk; the humour, the irony and the empathy. I waved to her
and now I too felt like moving! I take a lovely walk along the
waterfront.
Now I am back in Heidelberg and when I think about
how Betty’s “Princessin” left this world on September 5th and that in
August I was speaking about her with Betty in Seattle I feel very sad.
The readers who knew her well (we feel that every author and hero of a
book is nearer to us than our fleeting neighbours next door) yes we, who
thought of her as immortal, cannot believe that even she would die
after 92 years. How unforeseen and unexpected that her death should come
four days after her birthday on September 1th. On September 5th I was
on my way to Turkey, once again in seventh heaven, looking back on the
unforgettable days in Seattle. I was flying from west to east towards
the rising sun.
Ryan Brown 
January 18, 2017: 2:35 PM ET 
?
“[Change] could reflect an effort to take into account the different audiences
or circumstances (winning or concession speech in a state, for
example),” they wrote. “We can see that Hilary Clinton has the highest
standard deviation and so the biggest change of choice of words from one
speech to another, while Ted Cruz varies the least in his choices.”
Up next was a look at politicians’ grammar.
