Betty MacDonald's sister Alison Bard Burnett
Betty MacDonald's mother Sydney with grandchild Alison Beck
Betty and Don MacDonald in Hollywood
Betty MacDonald fan club fans,
we are very curious to learn more about Betty MacDonald's experiences in Hollywood especially Eartha is dreaming of Hollywood very often.
Betty MacDonald Memorial Award winner Wolfgang Hampel does a great job.
Thanks a Million!
Eartha can imagine very well to be a Hollywood movie star.
Who are Betty MacDonald's favourite actors?
By the way Maximilian Schell's Marlene Dietrich documentary should have won the Oscar.
It's a masterpiece.
Join our current Betty MacDonald fan club contest, please.
If you know the persons in our photo send us a mail.
Deadline: August 31, 2016
You can win very interesting Betty MacDonald fan club items.
Betty MacDonald fan club newsletter November includes the updated Betty MacDonald fan club essays ' Betty MacDonald in Hollywood' and ' Betty MacDonald and Dorita Hess '.
There is also an article about Betty MacDonald fan club letter collection.
We got very important info regarding the original 'The Egg and I' and the way Betty MacDonald described her first husband Robert Eugene Heskett and their neighbours.
Many greetings from Betty MacDonald fan club organizer Linde Lund.
We are very happy that Betty MacDonald fan club got so many fans in 40 countries.
At the current time I'm rather busy because my father got a very serious heart attack some time ago.
There is reason to be optimistic according to the doctors but we need lots of time and patience.
Therefore I'm really very grateful that author Heiderose Teynor is going to support us with activities on Facebook establishing a new site promoting her literary work ( which I adore ) Betty MacDonald fan club and Vita Magica.
Thanks a million dearest Heiderose!
Now let's introduce our good friend and author Heiderose Teynor!
My name is Heiderose Teynor. I live with my family in Neckarsteinach near Heidelberg.
I’ve studied history
and politics at Heidelberg University and I was always interested in
journalism and wrote my first articles during my study. Later I worked on short
stories and started my writing career.
I adore criminal stories with
meaning and understanding, when the reader has to reflect about it.
2. My favorite writer:
I like Donna Leon's stories in book form or on TV.
3. The kind of literature:
It is not very easy to
write good stories, and a teacher said to me “You can do anything,
just do not get bored!” I try to entertain my readers that they cannot
stop. In holidays I visited Italy and the Tuscany. I love these old
towns like San Gimignano, Siena or Pisa. Another aspect is my home
region round Heidelberg. Visitors from all over the world visit this
town, the castle and the river Neckar. So why is it so much interesting?
I tried to research it.
My book “Im Bann der Omertà” is about my home region around Heidelberg and the Tuscany. It is
a story about organized crime and the duty of silence. The special feature in “Im Bann der Omertà” are the regional stories both around Heidelberg and in Tuscany.
4. My opinion to Betty MacDonald
Betty
MacDonald’s “The Egg and I” is very funny and amusing as Betty MacDonald
wrote about her childhood and youth, and later about her experiences at
the chicken farm. This is a
wonderful gift to describe everyday life like she does it! Some other
people would not even see it, but she was able to write a whole book in a
very amusing and witty style.
I
heard about Betty MacDonald and The Egg and I
in Vita Magica from Wolfgang Hampel. Through facebook and net I met
Linde Lund. It is very
interesting to attend Vita Magica last Tuesday every month. The program
is always very interesting with quiet different writers and
musicians.
5. My appearence in Vita Magica
I will read together with other writers on 30th of May 2017, when Heidelberg is on program and with “Im Bann der Omertà” I will be guest reader on 28th of November 2017.
Yours,
Heiderose Teynor
www.teynor-kje.de
A very warm welcome dearest Heiderose to Betty MacDonald fan club and thanks a million for your outstanding support!
Love,
Linde Lund
www.teynor-kje.de
A very warm welcome dearest Heiderose to Betty MacDonald fan club and thanks a million for your outstanding support!
Love,
Linde Lund
Do you want to see photos of Betty MacDonald's beloved grandmother Gammy?
You can see several ones in Betty MacDonald fan club newsletter November.
Isn't this great?
By the way I totally agree. The author of an oustanding Betty MacDonald biography needs a very good sense of humor.
We will be able to offer you very witty and exciting stories because of our outstanding Betty MacDonald research and many interviews with Betty MacDonald's family and friends by Betty MacDonald fan club founder Wolfgang Hampel.
We are going to publish new Betty MacDonald fan club items including new Betty MacDonald interviews by Wolfgang Hampel.
Work and life of Betty MacDonald will be honored by Wolfgang Hampel in Vita Magica.
Anyway - we agree that Betty MacDonald's brilliant sister Alison Bard Burnett and Betty MacDonald fan club founder Wolfgang Hampel have a very good sense of humor.
Betty MacDonald fan club fans from 5 continents enjoy these unique very witty interviews and new ones will follow.
We hope we'll be able to read Wolfgang Hampel's new very well researched stories about Betty MacDonald, Robert Eugene Heskett, Donald Chauncey MacDonald, Darsie Bard, Sydney Bard, Gammy, Alison Bard Burnett, Darsie Beck, Mary Bard Jensen, Clyde Reynolds Jensen, Sydney Cleveland Bard, Mary Alice Bard, Dorothea DeDe Goldsmith, Madge Baldwin, Don Woodfin, Mike Gordon, Ma and Pa Kettle, Nancy and Plum, Mrs. Piggle-Wiggle and others - very soon.
It' s such a pleasure to read them.
Don't miss Brad Craft's ' A reign of frogs and toads ', please.
You'll enjoy it very much.
Let's go to magical Betty MacDonald's Vashon Island.
Fat. Pig. Dog. Slob. Disgusting animal.
These are just some of the names that Donald Trump has called women over the years. Yes, a man who's hoping to become President of the United States and presumably persuade a few women to vote for him, too.
The billionaire has
been widely called out for his objectification of women - he has a
tendency to criticise them for their looks - and sexist remarks.
Betty MacDonald's grandmother Gammy would say: He is a pig and he really is.
Mrs. Piggle-Wiggle shouldn't try to change him.
It's a waste of time.
I totally agree with this. Now he is warning of a possible World War III that Hillary might start.
This guy is really crazy!
I totally agree! You can't vote for a guy like this.
The way he behaves is a joke - but a very bad one!
A guy like this should live in Mrs. Monday's boarding house.
Betty MacDonald's grandmother Gammy would say: He is a pig and he really is.
Mrs. Piggle-Wiggle shouldn't try to change him.
It's a waste of time.
I totally agree with this. Now he is warning of a possible World War III that Hillary might start.
This guy is really crazy!
I totally agree! You can't vote for a guy like this.
The way he behaves is a joke - but a very bad one!
A guy like this should live in Mrs. Monday's boarding house.
Betty MacDonald fan club organizer Linde Lund and Betty MacDonald fan club research team share their recent Betty MacDonald fan club research results.
Congratulations! They found the most interesting and important info for Wolfgang Hampel's oustanding Betty MacDonald biography.
I enjoy Bradley Croft's story very much.
Don't miss our Betty MacDonald fan club contests, please.
You can win a never published before Alison Bard Burnett interview by Betty MacDonald fan club founder Wolfgang Hampel.
Good luck!
This CD is a golden treasure because Betty MacDonald's very witty sister Alison Bard Burnett shares unique stories about Betty MacDonald, Mary Bard Jensen, Mrs. Piggle-Wiggle and Nancy and Plum.
Do you have any books by Betty MacDonald and Mary Bard Jensen with funny or interesting dedications?
If so would you be so kind to share them?
Our next Betty MacDonald fan club project is a collection of these unique dedications.
If you share your dedication from your Betty MacDonald - and Mary Bard Jensen collection you might be the winner of our new Betty MacDonald fan club items.
Thank you so much in advance for your support.
Join our new Betty MacDonald fan club contest, please.
What happened to Betty MacDonald on October 30, 1938?
Send your answer, please and perhaps you'll be the lucky winner of several fascinating Betty MacDonald fan club items.
Deadline: October 31, 2016
Thank you so much for sending us your favourite Betty MacDonald quote.
More info are coming soon.
Wolfgang Hampel's Betty MacDonald and Ma and Pa Kettle biography and Betty MacDonald interviews have fans in 40 countries. I'm one of their many devoted fans.
Many Betty MacDonald - and Wolfgang Hampel fans are very interested in a Wolfgang Hampel CD and DVD with his very funny poems and stories.
Wolfgang Hampel invited a very famous author for Vita Magica October and it was very successful.
Betty MacDonald Fan Club fans from all over the World are very interested in Wolfgang Hampel's interviews, stories and poems.
You'll be able to read some of Wolfgang Hampel's new satirical stories and poems in our Betty MacDonald Fan Club newsletter. It'll be available in November.
Wolfgang Hampel is journalist, author, artist and poet.
He is the winner of the first Betty MacDonald Memorial Award.
As we all know Wolfgang Hampel founded Betty MacDonald Fan Club and Betty MacDonald Society in 1983.
Betty MacDonald Fan Club got members in 40 countries.
Wolfgang Hampel visited all the places where Betty MacDonald and her family lived.
Wolfgang Hampel's new Betty MacDonald documentary of Betty MacDonald's life in Boulder, Butte, Seattle, Laurelhurst, Chimacum, Vashon Island, Carmel and Carmel Valley is really fascinating. My personal favourites are scenes of Betty's and Don's life in Carmel and Carmel Valley.
Wolfgang Hampel, author of Betty MacDonald Biography, interviewed Betty MacDonald's family and friends and many other famous artists and writers, for example Astrid Lindgren, Truman Capote, J. K. Rowling, Maurice Sendak, David Guterson, Donna Leon, Ingrid Noll, Marie Marcks, William Cumming, Walt Woodward and Betty MacDonald Fan Club Honour Members Monica Sone, Letizia Mancino, Darsie Beck and Gwen Grant.
Wolfgang Hampel is also very well known for his satirical poems and stories.
We are going to share Wolfgang Hampel's work with many fans from all over the world who adore his Betty MacDonald Biography and unique Betty MacDonald Interviews.
Wolfgang Hampel's newest literary project is Vita Magica.
Tell us the names of this mysterious couple please and you can win a very new Betty MacDonald documentary.
Betty MacDonald fan club honor member Mr. Tigerli is beloved all over the World.
We are so happy that our 'Casanova' is back.
Don't miss a new breakfast with Brad and Nick, please.
Yours,
Richard
 |
Don't miss this very special book, please.
Vita Magica
Betty MacDonald
Betty MacDonald fan club
Betty MacDonald forum
Wolfgang Hampel - Wikipedia ( English )
Wolfgang Hampel - Wikipedia ( English ) - The Egg and I
Wolfgang Hampel - Wikipedia ( Polski)
Wolfgang Hampel - Wikipedia ( German )
Wolfgang Hampel - LinkFang ( German ) Wolfgang Hampel - Academic ( German )
Wolfgang Hampel - cyclopaedia.net ( German )
Wolfgang Hampel - DBpedia ( English / German )
Wolfgang Hampel - people check ( English )
Wolfgang Hampel - Memim ( English )
Vashon Island - Wikipedia ( German )
Wolfgang Hampel - Monica Sone - Wikipedia ( English )
Wolfgang Hampel - Ma and Pa Kettle - Wikipedia ( English )
Wolfgang Hampel - Ma and Pa Kettle - Wikipedia ( French )
Wolfgang Hampel - Mrs. Piggle-Wiggle - Wikipedia ( English)
Wolfgang Hampel in Florida State University
Betty MacDonald fan club founder Wolfgang Hampel
Betty MacDonald fan club interviews on CD/DVD
Betty MacDonald fan club items
Betty MacDonald fan club items - comments
Betty MacDonald fan club - The Stove and I
Betty MacDonald fan club groups
Betty MacDonald fan club organizer Linde Lund
If Donald Trump becomes president, could World War 3 start as a result?
50 Answers
To
the degree that his statements reflect reality, it is unlikely. Trump's
entire outlook is financially based and wars are very expensive. This
seems to match his non-hawkish positions on every front.
- On the Iraq war, he claims he was against it from the start (in reality it was after the war had started) and he claimed it would destabilize the Middle East.
- On North Korea, he wants to leverage China to solve the North Korean situation:
- On Iran, he is willing to "police" the Iran nuclear deal as hard as possible, but not "tear it up" as others have stated.
- On Russia, he is already making friends with Putin while his GOP competition states they would punch Putin in the nose.
- On Syria, he wants to see Russia take care of ISIS while his GOP competition wants to carpet bomb the entire region.
While
Trump doesn't seem to be hawkish, he talks big, states he wants to
increase military size and strength. With terrorism, he claims he would
he in favor of killing the families of terrorists and go beyond
waterboarding.
Immediately? No. No-one will declare war on the US just because Trump is elected.
From a more cynical/world view position one could argue that WW3 has already started. Just look at the middle east. We see ISIL/ISIS/IS/Daesh/whatev
So yeah, I don't think WW3 will erupt if Trump is elected. I think it already has, we just haven't realised yet. We have a real life battle of the 5 armies.
From a more cynical/world view position one could argue that WW3 has already started. Just look at the middle east. We see ISIL/ISIS/IS/Daesh/whatev
So yeah, I don't think WW3 will erupt if Trump is elected. I think it already has, we just haven't realised yet. We have a real life battle of the 5 armies.
Well
there are a couple of places Trump has gotten himself into trouble in
terms of foreign policy. He has advocated for starting a trade war with
China by imposing various tariffs and by plunging both the US and China
into recession.
Here's a good article to illustrate how The Republican front runner plans on tanking our economy.
Donald
Trump has also spoken about how the nuclear option is something “he
wouldn't rule out” to fight terrorist groups. He has also spoken about
how we should allow other various countries including Japan, Korea, and
Saudi Arabia to own nukes as well.
Here's an article about Trump’s thoughts on nuclear proliferation.
These
positions he has taken, and many more like it, lead many people to
think that a Trump Administration would lead to a decline in the
international community’s respect for the US as responsible, respectful
allies.
I hope this helps. There are probably
other reasons why Trump might take us into a new World War, but these
are the two I could think up while at work!
Look
at how Trump has jumped to declare that Egypt Air flight 804 was caused
by terrorism before all the facts are in. Now, this certainly could
wind up being a terrorist act (as I am writing this they have still not
declared as such, they are just finding the wreckage and no organization
has taken credit for bringing down the plane), but it can also be
something else. He dangerously speaks before he has all the facts. And
even when facts seem to be known about things, he still declares he
knows different ( he broached the idea Anton Scalia was murdered, Ted
Cruz’s father was with Oswald before the Kennedy assassination, that
Obama was really a Muslim, that the U.S. government was involved int he
9/11 attacks, Muslims marched in Jersey City after those same attacks,
vaccines cause autism and on and on.) all of this is dangerous
misinformation.
Acting before thinking or
disregarding facts because of your gut is not the behavior of a
Commander in Chief. It could get us into a war very easily
While
I don't honestly believe anyone in present times is stupid enough to
start a global war. I do believe Donald Trump stands for all of the
wrong things politically in a time where standing for the wrong things
could mean ticking off the wrong people and starting a firestorm.
As a Canadian I don't even understand the anti-Muslim rhetoric im with the sign holder!
Islam is almost a quarter of the population globally...
Alienating
the largest religion because some of the members of their group are
trying to murder people in the desert over archaic laws. The basic
stance of anti-Muslim in the most free country in the world is almost so
insane I don't even know how it passed the joke stage.
Donald
Trump, is very adamant on his plans for removing the "muslim problem"
the way he talks about using the US ARMY to get things done is fucked up
and it almost sounds like something you'd hear out of the mic of a
redneck on an old MW2 lobby.
This is an image from a news cover back when trump announced his run for presidency.
What the fuck happened, how is anyone taking this shit seriously?
Trump is a reality TV KING
He
understands that the majority of the american people are sheep, and
sheep like reality TV. The candidate who most often wins on the show is
the one with the most memorable personality the brash confident one.
He's
playing on the hearts and minds of all the american people right now
like a fucking reality TV show and it sickens me. He just says crazy
shit but then flips 180 back to his core beliefs and they all eat it up.
Good
luck America, I sincerely hope you don't let this happen to us because
we'll be cleaning up after trumps mess for a long fuckin time.
If you enjoyed my content please check out my website LagSwitch - Gaming| News | Coding | Dev Journals .
I also run a YouTube channel where I do loads of gaming content and even some educational whiteboards! Lag Switch Gaming Youtube
Thanks for reading, and I hope you enjoyed! Don't forget to leave an up-vote on the way out it really helps my content get seen!
I
laughed out loud when I read this question. Don't get me wrong, this is
not a bad question. If you knew my opinion of Trump, you might find it
funny too.
Trump is a joke, and the world knows it. He's treating the presidential election like it's literally a game of popularity. He only says what they want to hear. The democratic process in the US is pretty much a game of popularity, but it was always a battle of government policy. It was about the people considering the political reforms and policies of the next government, about how they would do things differently. It was about weighing in the intelligence and character of the next president. The prior presidental debates were professional. Trump has made it personal.
His proposals are laughable. His ideas are painfully simplistic. The real scary thing though, is that Trump is the physical representation of the sociological backwardness of the US. His polls say so. The only way he has made it so far is because they support him, they actually believe in him. This doesn't mean Donald Trump is incompetent, his family is admirable.
But to put this into perspective, the UK is currently debating on a petition of 573,000 signatures to ban Trump from entering the UK. I read that a couple days ago.
If Trump becomes president, he could start WW3. But that will only be because of a reaction from another country. This goes to show, we really shouldn't let a man like Donald Trump become President of the United States of America.
Trump is a joke, and the world knows it. He's treating the presidential election like it's literally a game of popularity. He only says what they want to hear. The democratic process in the US is pretty much a game of popularity, but it was always a battle of government policy. It was about the people considering the political reforms and policies of the next government, about how they would do things differently. It was about weighing in the intelligence and character of the next president. The prior presidental debates were professional. Trump has made it personal.
His proposals are laughable. His ideas are painfully simplistic. The real scary thing though, is that Trump is the physical representation of the sociological backwardness of the US. His polls say so. The only way he has made it so far is because they support him, they actually believe in him. This doesn't mean Donald Trump is incompetent, his family is admirable.
But to put this into perspective, the UK is currently debating on a petition of 573,000 signatures to ban Trump from entering the UK. I read that a couple days ago.
If Trump becomes president, he could start WW3. But that will only be because of a reaction from another country. This goes to show, we really shouldn't let a man like Donald Trump become President of the United States of America.
In the public appearances he's made, he has said some very reckless and thoughtless things.
He's
recently said he's not going to honor our NATO agreement without more
money from our allies, and he's advocated letting Japan and South Korea
defend themselves, including using nuclear weapons.
Trump
made statements about using a ‘carpet bombing’ strategy to defeat ISIS,
thereby killing thousands of innocent men, women, and children.
Furthermore, Trump has made inflammatory remarks about Muslims, causing
further alienation among the people we actually need to defeat ISIS and
other terrorist organizations.
He has proposed
canceling the recent agreement with Iran regarding their nuclear weapons
program. If Trump did cancel the deal, besides the ill will it would
create, it would no doubt give Iran a clear signal to speed up their
development of nuclear bombs. In my opinion, the cancellation of the
Iran agreement may further destabilize an already unstable region, and
invite other nations in the Middle East to develop their own nuclear
programs .
Trump has put so many potentially
disastrous and dangerous ideas out there, that it's difficult to imagine
that there won't be some kind of war in our future if he's elected. He
is spouting a foreign policy viewpoint that promotes isolationism for
the US. A policy that was prevalent just prior to WW II.
Donald
Trump's conduct has created perception problems abroad. He may be a
well-meaning person but many of his out of the box solutions are highly
questionable like building a wall along the Mexican border and making
Mexicans pay for it. This has been criticised by former Mexican
Presidents. The historic veracity and wisdom of what he had to publicly
say regarding Pershing's decision of shooting of captured Philippino
Muslim guerrillas with bullet heads dipped in pig's blood is also
questionable. Over 50% of the Americans consider that his election as
president will embarrass the US. Some of his public statements are
considered as hate speech. Hundreds of thousands of British citizens do
not want him to enter their country. He has to display greater maturity
to ensure that he is more acceptable to both, the Americans and
foreigners.
His welcoming stance on the Brexit
results are at odds with not only the American establishment but also
internationally recognized experts that it will weaken the west. So far,
foreign perceptions place him in the extreme right. He has to prove
with his conduct that his detractors have misperceptions.
If
he attains the position of POTUS without changing his attitude, foreign
embassies will be curious and worried regarding the future. He could
initiate a brinkmanship cycle which could spiral out of control.
Any
poorly handled faux pas by: POTUS Trump could spiral out of control and
ultimately lead to loss of US prestige even if a WW3 does not take
place.
He still requires mid course correction,
better perception managers and a more deliberate, circumspect approach
enriched by worthy advisors and official briefings.
However,
it was truly amazing that his comments on the Turkish coup reflected
the sentiments of the prodemocracy Taqsim Square crowd. He also has non
intrusive views on Iraq and Libya. Additionally, he is optimistic
regarding his interaction with Mr Putin. He has an impressive learning
curve behind him. With his all pervasive dynamism, who knows he might be
able to pull out the US from the bog of bloated anti terrorism
obsessions and quasi cold war dabblings!
By
sending regular troops into the Syrian civil war where they
accidentally clash with Russians. After that it doesn’t take all that
much for things to start spiraling out of control.
The
world already held its breath once when Turkey shot down an Russian
aircraft that was trespassing its airspace. While nothing direct came of
that, a “proportional response” or even self-defense by Russian plane
against Turkish troops could have been construed as an attack against a
member of NATO. We lucked out.
In all practicable probabilities, no.
Even the president of the United States has restraints as to what he can and cannot order.
More than once, in history, people and groups have circumvented that, as Bush/Cheney and fabricated CIA reports, aided by Cheney insiders in the NSA, allowed the attack on Iraq for non existent WMD.
But it is an exception, difficult to do, even more difficult to repeat.
The probability of Trump winning, regardless of the media reporting, media owned and controlled by the One Percent, is somewhere between slim and none.
Republicans are approximately 26% of Americans.
Trump draws a substantial number of that, 38% (?).
You do the math.
The One Percent agenda of dumbing down America, as successful as it has been cannot overcome that math, without external intervention as in 2000.
I seriously doubt it can happen, in 2016, but also be assured, the One Percent, have no intention of retiring.
Their goal (Murdock, Koch, brothers etc) is to destroy and replace the democracy with an oligarchy.
Were that to happen it would only be temporary, like the monarchy of France in the late 18th century.
And the result in America in the 21st century, will be the same as the result in France in the late 1700's.
Even the president of the United States has restraints as to what he can and cannot order.
More than once, in history, people and groups have circumvented that, as Bush/Cheney and fabricated CIA reports, aided by Cheney insiders in the NSA, allowed the attack on Iraq for non existent WMD.
But it is an exception, difficult to do, even more difficult to repeat.
The probability of Trump winning, regardless of the media reporting, media owned and controlled by the One Percent, is somewhere between slim and none.
Republicans are approximately 26% of Americans.
Trump draws a substantial number of that, 38% (?).
You do the math.
The One Percent agenda of dumbing down America, as successful as it has been cannot overcome that math, without external intervention as in 2000.
I seriously doubt it can happen, in 2016, but also be assured, the One Percent, have no intention of retiring.
Their goal (Murdock, Koch, brothers etc) is to destroy and replace the democracy with an oligarchy.
Were that to happen it would only be temporary, like the monarchy of France in the late 18th century.
And the result in America in the 21st century, will be the same as the result in France in the late 1700's.
Considering
that Trump is actually against the neoconservative wing of the GOP, the
one that is advocating for active military engagement and regime change
across the globe, this is a strange question.
Trump
lays out a policy that is more isolationist and focused on internal
problems that the US is facing, and has declared time and time again
that he is against projecting military power in situations other than
imminent threat to the US.
He talks more about
being tough in negotiations and financial dealings with other countries,
not using military force as a tool to resolve conflicts.
This doesn't sound like a very militant position.
It
appears that the question stems from the innuendo that the media is
creating around his personality, portraying him as a fascist type of a
leader. He is a populist, and his demeanor does come across crass and
egomaniacal. But when you listen to what he has to say (and it's
extremely simple to understand, lol!), he is talking about reclaiming
the right to actually be a determined and assertive negotiator
leveraging economic and political tools, and not only be on the giving
end of any international interaction.
I
think other world leaders wouldn't take him seriously. Although, that
could be dangerous. Some historians have written that the Cuban Missile
Crisis was partially caused by Khrushchev's low opinion of JFK. He
thought that he was inexperienced, and could easily be pushed around. I
think he later gained respect for him. But, comparing JFK to Trump is
like comparing Margaret Mead to Sarah Palin, or Einstein to Pee Wee
Herman.
Trump
wants to get rid of NATO; in doing that we will lose our Allies. The
military at that point would likely go rogue and a coup would be
possible. Trump wants to start trade wars with Mexico and China. That
would lead to an enormous drop in exports and would damage the economy.
At this time, our financial situation is being propped up by our ability
to buy cheap Chinese exports. Not only would US economy probably
collapse into a second Great Depression, but we will again take the rest
of the world's large economies with us. Mexico is a huge trading
partner. If we anger them we could start another US Mexico War like what
occurred in the time of Teddy Roosevelt. If we cozy up to Putin, it
will speed the rise of Iran. They almost have nuclear weapons capable of
starting WWIII. Remember the stability that we do have on this planet,
the reason we have not had another war, is US leadership in maintaining
stability and peace. And if we leave North Korea to the discretion of
China, we face a very dangerous scenario. China is already an increasing
military threat to us. They are currently a threat to all of East Asia,
as we see right now they have manufactured an island in the South China
Sea. If they are able to control that area they are a huge threat to
Japan (our ally) and the entire Asian continent. So the answer is that
Trump would definitely and indisputably be a huge part and could
actually be the biggest player in WWIII.
America
could quite possibly be at war during Trumps’s tenure as President.
Currently America has about 5,000 combat troops on the ground fighting
ISIS, but they call it training and another 7000 paid contractors
essentially doing the same thing. Obama prefers to call these people
trainers. They are dying in combat missions however and we will not call
it war.
ISIS
was born under the Obama Administration and is now estimated at over
30,000 solders operating in 12 countries with worldwide reach to include
the US. Although this Administration insists that ISIS is being
contained it’s influence continues to grow with constant terror attacks
around the world.
ISIS must be stopped and
Obama is not stopping it so, it will be left to the next President,
hopefully Trump, to put an end to Obama’s creation. Mrs. Clinton was
instrumental in creating these monsters and would only continue Obama’s
foreign policy of appeasement and an Islamic apologetic; the new Neville
Chamberlains of the 21st century. Peace at any cost even the cost of
freedom.
Russia, China, North Korea and Iran
have all exploited the weakness or compliant foreign policy of the Obama
Administration and are expanding their military reach and influence.
China is building military bases in the South China Sea to control the
vast shipping that traverses these waters, with the possible intent on
controlling world trade.
Russia invaded and
occupies the Crimea and threatens Eastern Europe. Iran, now much richer
due to Obama, promises to destroy America and Israel. North Korea also
is threatening to use an atomic bomb on the US. Obama, however, has
declared war on American culture by declaring that bathrooms are gender
neutral.
Any war that the American people and
the next President of the United States face is a war started by Barack
Obama due, either to his weakness or his complicit foreign policy to
weaken America.
Sadly, under Obama, our
military has also been decimated with fighter aircraft on the ground due
to a shortage of parts. Our Navy is smaller then it was prior to WWII
and the Army continues to shrink, not only in strength, but in moral.
The question should be: Why has Barack Obama, Hilary Clinton and John Kerry put the entire world on the brink of war?
It
is my belief that if the unlikely event of Trump becoming President.
That a Trump Presidency would end in either a resignation by Trump due
to his frustrations with the limited powers of the Presidency which he
will have a hard time coping with emotionally and pragmatically.
Or
it would end in an impeachment on misuse of power charges when Trump
attempts to bypass congress and international law (by attempting to
force Mexico to pay for the wall) and by the use of executive orders to
order the building of his southern broader wall. So he would be
impeached before Congress would allow him to get us into WW3.
Think
about this if Donald Trump does become president and deport immigrants
out of the US first it violates their US Citizen Rights and mostly if he
does become president and deports immigrants out they will have to go
to Ellis Island and will go to Russia and Austria-Hungary and their
allies too will attack us and he'll probably will get assassinated and
we will attack along with our allies starting a real world war.
Also Sophia said that Ireland is allied with America, that is false
Ireland is neutral, shows how much she knows about politics here is a
list (you will notice that Ireland is not in this list) Strongest
Allies:-Israel-Great Britain-Australia-CanadaS
He
is not going to win. It was proven long ago, that no ammount of money
can change outcome of the election, if people don't like the runner to
begin with. He is not the first mil/bilionaire to run, and not the last.
They are just bored.
Hilary is going to win, whether that is good or not, well... we will see.
And to "IF": No, it will not erupt even if he would win. Total wars are history and no matter the idion in charge, US won't start war with anyone who could fight back. Not to mention, people of US do not vote for president, electoral college does, and they can vote however they like, no matter what people wish...
Hilary is going to win, whether that is good or not, well... we will see.
And to "IF": No, it will not erupt even if he would win. Total wars are history and no matter the idion in charge, US won't start war with anyone who could fight back. Not to mention, people of US do not vote for president, electoral college does, and they can vote however they like, no matter what people wish...
No Hillary Clinton is trying to start World war 3
A Hillary Clinton presidency will quickly usher in World War 3.
Michele
Flournoy, the former Defense Department official whom Defense One calls
“the woman expected to run the Pentagon under Hillary Clinton,” this
week advocated for “sending more American troops into combat against
ISIS and the Assad regime than the Obama administration has been willing
to commit.” In an interview with that outlet, Flournoy “said she would
direct U.S. troops to push President Bashar al-Assad’s forces out of
southern Syria and would send more American boots to fight the Islamic
State in the region.” She had previously “condemned the Obama
administration’s ISIS policy as ineffectual,” denouncing it as
“under-resourced.”
This week, Flournoy
specifically advocated what she called “limited military coercion” to
oust Assad. In August 2014, Obama announced what he called “limited
airstrikes in Iraq” — and they’re still continuing almost two years
later. Also note the clinical euphemism Flournoy created — “military
coercion” — for creating a “no-bomb zone” that would entail “a
declaratory policy backed up by the threat of force. ‘If you bomb the
folks we support, we will retaliate using standoff means to destroy
[Russian] proxy forces, or, in this case, Syrian assets,’” she said.
Despite D.C. conventional wisdom that Obama is guilty of “inaction” in
Syria, he has sent substantial aid, weapons, and training to Syrian
rebels while repeatedly bombing ISIS targets in Syria.
No amount of war and destruction is never enough for these people.
Even
U.S. military officials have said that these sorts of no-fly or no-bomb
guarantees Flournoy is promising — which Hillary Clinton herself has
previously advocated — would risk a military confrontation with Russia.
Obama’s defense secretary, Ash Carter, told a Senate hearing last
December that the policy Clinton advocates “would require ‘substantial’
ground forces and would put the U.S. military at risk of a direct
confrontation with the Syrian regime and Russian forces.” Nonetheless,
the Pentagon official highly likely to be Clinton’s defense secretary is
clearly signaling their intention to proceed with escalated military
action. The carnage in Syria is horrifying, but no rational person
should think that U.S. military action will be designed to “help
Syrians.”
But the fact that Hillary Clinton has
a history of advocating more war and killing and support for heinous
regimes and occupations is the one thing Democratic pundits have, with
remarkable message discipline, completely ignored. From Bernie Bros to
Sanders’ Secret Service costs to Hillary’s kick-ass, mic-dropping,
slay-queen tweets, they’ve invented the most embarrassingly childish and
trivial distractions to ensure they don’t have to talk about it. But
now Clinton’s almost-certain defense secretary is already — months
before she’s in power — expressly advocating more war and bombing and
dangerous interventions. That makes the costs of a Clinton foreign
policy — at least for those who assign any value to lives outside of
American soil — much harder, and more shameful, to ignore.
There's two answers to this question and they're "yes" and "no".
The
first response is based on the assumption that Trump is telling the
truth, that he really is here to bring fascism to the States - with all
the international horror that would bring. The latter is based on this:
Trump is a salesman and a show-man. He knows who to pander to and he
knows exactly how to do it to get a crazily loyal following (the sole
purpose of which seems to be rough ego-caressing). If you don't mind
some shameless self-promotion, I explore both possibilities in this blog
post: Dynasty and Farce in D.C.: Perspective of a Brit No One Asked by Luke O'Brien on Paddy's Scribbles
You
may not like Donald Trump, but he is nobody’s fool to have gotten where
he is today. Looking at it from the Trump hater’s perspective, since
(as you all say) he is all about the money and greed, it would make no
sense to start a war and jeopardize his personal wealth with a WWIII.
From a more rational perspective, Trump is a consummate negotiator by virtue of his success. Say what you will about the man, he seems to always get his way when negotiating with people, institutions, corporations and entire industries. I would much prefer his negotiating skills sitting across from the Iranians, Cubans, Syrians and Russians to what we have had over the past 6 and half years.
No, there will be not be a WWIII if Trump becomes President.
From a more rational perspective, Trump is a consummate negotiator by virtue of his success. Say what you will about the man, he seems to always get his way when negotiating with people, institutions, corporations and entire industries. I would much prefer his negotiating skills sitting across from the Iranians, Cubans, Syrians and Russians to what we have had over the past 6 and half years.
No, there will be not be a WWIII if Trump becomes President.
If
a relatively “stable” man like George W. Bush could lead us into a
specious war under false pretenses, what do you think a loose cannon and
master manipulator like Donald Trump would be capable of doing? The
good thing is, so many people dislike him and don’t trust him, that even
if by some horrible “anti-miracle” he became president, he would be
constantly watched and kept in check by myriad forces. He would possibly
be the most ineffective president ever, simply because everything he
proposed would be second—and third and fourth, etc.—guessed, even by
members of his own party. Sad to say, but he would have to be led around
and watched like a small child at an adult party. Pathetic.
As
a direct result of his election? No, I don’t think so. Declaring war on
a country because you don’t like the result of its election is very
hard to sell.
Will a major war start after
several years of his disastrous foreign policy, of his neglecting a
president’s responsibilities in that area, of Putin being encouraged to
believe that we will abandon to him the NATO members who’ve stood
shoulder to shoulder with us for a lifetime? Well that’s another matter.
My
(short) answer: Yes, through The Donald’s sheer carelessness. During
this campaign alone, Trump has already displayed a tendency to get
distracted, an inability to admit he’s ever wrong, a capacity for
holding grudges… the list goes on and on, and in fact fits well with the
typical layman’s picture of a psychopath.
It’s
hard to say if he’d actually start World War III by himself. Actually
it’s hard to say with any confidence what he’d do in office, except that
whatever it is it’ll always be to the greater glory of The Donald… and
to hell with what anyone else cares or needs. That’s what so scary about
him, and that’s why he’s too dangerous to be President.
Trump
has talked of abrogating US treaty responsibilities and obligations.
Here is exactly how a world war would get started, and lost, by him:
It's
January 20th, 2017 and Donald Trump has just been inaugurated as the
45th President of the United States. In his inauguration speech, he
declares that all US allies must either pay 5% of GDP towards defense or
the US will abrogate its treaty obligations.
NATO
countries call Trump's bluff and continue paying around 1.5-2.3% of GDP
on defense. Russia, willing to also call Trump's bluff, begins a
disinformation and false-flag operation against the Black Sea and Baltic
States within three months. By July, Russia is poised to invade and
Trump simply says "Well, I told you you had to pay and you didn't. Not
my problem. Dos vedanya."
The Black Sea and
Baltics fall rapidly to a combined Russian blitzkrieg/hybrid-warfare
campaign. European nations still dedicated to NATO try to negotiate a
cease fire, but Russia disregards and works towards taking Romania,
Bulgaria, and parts of Poland. The Nordic Countries are holding a line
but not in a position to attack. Turkey is still reeling from the coup
and can offer no aid. Europe is now Russia's b*tch
Seeing
that the US does nothing, Iran and China begin making their own moves.
Trump waffles, and they take what they are after. The US's former key
allies have all now been either defeated or positioned in such a way
that they are unable to act. The US now has multiple clear and present
dangers to the nation. The country is also in an economic depression as
virtually all former trade agreement were abrogated in response to the
lack of US action. And Trump is blaming everyone but himself saying it's
not his fault we didn't stick by our friends and allies.
A
North Korean cargo freighter flying a false flag sails to Los Angeles
and detonates a nuclear device, irradiating the region and killing tends
of thousands. Trump responds by firing all of the US nuclear stockpile
at all of America's enemies, who respond accordingly. More than a
billion die in the immediate nuclear holocaust and billions more do in
the months to follow owing to disruptions in supply chains of key
medical and consumer goods. The US no longer exist and South America and
Sub-Sahara Africa are now the richest and most populous places on
Earth.
Now, this is hyperbole. But it is also
how Trump could very easily act if he is elected. We, humanity as a
whole that is, cannot afford his ownership of the nuclear button.
Trump
will almost certainly not start WWIII. However, he has expressed
feelings of support or at least admiration of authoritarianism in many
contexts (Putin, the Chinese and North Korean leadership, etc.) and
skepticism regarding America’s commitments to allied nations. There is
an argument to be made that the most important contributor to the
relative peace of the modern era is American commitments to support
allies against the aggression of stronger rivals. If this view is
correct, then nations that wish they could use military force to conquer
their neighbors may think that a Trump presidency is their best chance
of accomplishing this. The result could lead to a global war much as the
weakness of France and Britain combined with the neutrality of the U.S.
set the stage for WWII.
Not
directly due to Trump but he will likely miscalculate the long-term
consequences of his actions which could lead to China filling the void
in East Asia. This is one of the rare things that will unify Asian
countries even if only in pee-spraying terror. Japan may panic and
screw up really bad, if it ends up in an actual fight it will likely win
due to technological superiority but will almost certainly take heavy
damage to its economy and population. Korea will freak out too but not
due to China, ultimately, there won't be war with its neighbor as the
other Korea knows it won't win. South Asians will absolutely freak out.
It would be comical if it weren't for the seriousness of the situation.
The Middle Eastners may get more aggressive with each other though but likely won't directly fight as they don't need too.
The
Europeans will not fight. Russia will menace them but will not actually
strike due to the slight logistical issue of occupying a continent
whose population is 4 times larger than yours
All in all, people will freak out but nobody will actually attack eachother
The
HUGE problem for millions of Americans and billions around the world is
if the fascist Trump gets into office the American economy will face
the threat of being totally destroyed !!! Just look what is already
happening due the British EU exit ! That will be nothing compared to
having a psychopathic megalomaniac in control of this country. His
policies would be so every disastrous that even the suggestion of it's
fiscal insanity is dangerous. Anybody who has hard earned savings or
retirement investments would suffer extreme losses. Unemployment could
skyrocket way beyond the last recession ! Thousands and thousands of
sudden businesses failures. It puts the U.S. in a much worse position
than countries like Greece or Argentina and also sparks an horrible
international financial crisis, like none since the Great Depression,
attacking the very underpinnings of the world economy. Once again, not
only fail, but would have unintended consequences that would be
disastrous to the American economy. Would this become the biggest
disaster in American history or only the beginning of the troubles ?
After Trump declares martial law, so many people's lives will be in
danger and when he starts WW3, they will be horribly extinguished in a
catastrophic Nuclear holocaust !
Not
a chance in hell. WW with whom? He is an admirer of Russia and North
Korea leadership. One thing people miss is, a war is an authorization of
Congress and not an executive decision of the president, Trump is a
business man, not a statesman.
There could be
however a 'massive' Trade War with China and complete animosity with the
EU, simply Trump will ignore the EU and fight China on trade.
One
final thing is, expect US international relations to suffer greatly
under Trump, the reason is he most likely will make very poor choices
when it comes to his advisors and secretary of state can be the likes of
John Bolton :)
-Because
People who "shoot from the Mouth" as much as Donald Trump does, would
probably be JUST as Quick- to "accidentally" get some OTHER "trigger
happy" World Leader- enraged at Him as well. Then; threats would Fly,
then Bullets, and bigger & BIGGER Bombs. Then each Counties Allies
would jump into the Fray- with Their threats, & Bombs... And finally
-Nukes woulds start hailing down from all parts of the Globe. And THAT
would be "The End" of the Story. OVER- and Out.
Does
world war 3 happen because of what is said about America from the
leader in North Korea everyday? How about the Leader of Iran?
With that said, I think the world is smart enough to ignore a meglomaniac when they see or should I say hear, one. A lot of leaders say stupid things, and the world will just have to tolerate one more nut, I mean, they already do, they'l just have to work a little harder tuning him out..
With that said, I think the world is smart enough to ignore a meglomaniac when they see or should I say hear, one. A lot of leaders say stupid things, and the world will just have to tolerate one more nut, I mean, they already do, they'l just have to work a little harder tuning him out..
We
do not have Earth around wars of only two countries, USA vs world.
Inhabitants of the nations' lands, properties have been involved in
fighting to defend their places, habitats, in increasingly larger
numbers coming annually to military ages buts from smaller numbers of
property guards at their citizenship dwellings, passport authorities.
One each of the photographed person.
The
closer the neighbors, the closer the contacts. We cannot measure even
the amount of probable votes that the Republican members will transfer
toward the total county conventions for each State, DC and territorial
delegations -- all with full complements of full-time, professional
government employees and peers, branches and boles, trunks and roots as
regards possessions. Lots of people are afraid of errors by USA machine
operators for good reasons. Earth is living planet that grows us,
bigger trees, but only endangered trophy hunters' prizes. Meanwhile,
something like 6,000,000 insects live around each of us and in our food
sources, the real beings that may convey happy honey bees' rewards where
the daily fare is harmonious.
A
nuclear disaster is no longer uncommon, mad science either, and
disgusting extractions of transplant cells where people can see the
disgusting experimenters at their workplaces that can be anywhere when
say an on-duty flight controller learns his lunch was foal meat, from a
horse hormone farm.
No,
it's not possible for anyone to start a third world war. If I'm being
pedantic (and who doesn't like that), we have had many more than two
world wars. So unless we got Germany and some allies against England,
France, Russia, and the U.S., it wouldn't be WWIII.
Donald Trump, even if he becomes POTUS would not be able to start a nuclear war or world war.
EDIT: I've had to amend my answer because of some video footage I recently came across.
My
first answer said I believed Trump would start WW3 due to his Zionist
connections. But in this video, Trump implies "they" (not defined) want
to start WW3, but that he does not.
The
relevant clip begins at 4 minutes, 39 seconds in case you'd like to see
it yourself. If you click the play button, it should begin at that time
marker.
Now
politicians will often say one thing to get elected, then do the exact
opposite once elected. That is entirely possible with Trump. But for now
I will have to take him at his word.
Opening my official book of "Definitive Answers as to Why So Many Do X".
Ahh, there it is. It is stated that:
1)
Some poorly intentioned individual had such a thought (likely
engendered by Mr. Trump's own bombastic and ill chosen verbiage) and
then chose to give it form on social media
2) The poorly intentioned thought given form was echoed for various reasons across social media platforms.
2) The poorly intentioned thought given form was echoed for various reasons across social media platforms.
Result: So Many Say This Thing.
Onward....
Best wishes.
So don't see any resent post so here I go.
Yes
I think he could and very easily anyone think that this is a joke ? has
forgotten the cold war as a kid or young adult. Those nukes are still
given to the President. Everyone say he unelectible aren't think this
out. So here is how Trumps wins Sanders need land side victories in all
remaining primarys (not going to happen ) to even get close to win so he
loses. Next all the young people will stay home because they will pout
that their man didn't win. So Hillary who has proven to know how to be
a diplomat will lose because those Sanders people will stay in. Hello
Mr President Trump.
Now here the part that
makes me wonder why people think this is not remotely possible. He has
stated," I will Bomb the fuck out of them," if we ever got attached. He
not talking planes he's talking nukes. We as a country are about to put
a man that taunt his rivals and,"is and like to fight"(art of the deal)
in power of the most destructive weapons on the planet. You all still
say this is unlikely. If you still feel this way them put heads in the
sand and kiss human kinds ass good bye.
Yes.
Well I am not entirely sure because at any rate anyone could start WW3,
Donald Trump has memes of him, people laugh at him, and my whole family
and friends don't like Mr. Donald Trump. But I’m more focused on not
letting Hilary Clinton win. So possibly its a yes. How? (I’m stating the
facts that I heard from my friends) I hear he treats women wrongly. His
wife doesn’t know how to speak English and also he’s racist. He just
acts like a 2 year old. So if Donald Trump becomes president, could WW3
start as result? Possibly yes.
By making the sky fall.
Such claims prove the desperation of the far left.
Wars
are always fought for profit; and Trump is a businessman, meaning that
in the end he is always practical, and will do what is best for the
country in terms of economic growth and GNP, while any debt will
strictly be leveraged to this end. No desire for “glory” at others’
expense, to “write history in blood” of someone else, or to say “let’s
you and him fight,” and then take credit for the “victory” achieved
someone else’s death… or false honor achieved thereby.
The
threat of nuclear war has been long past, and likewise there is no
profit in war for the United States other than national defense— not
the defense of private assets overseas, which are a question for
domestic and private security, and UN protection of international
waters.
Like the Founders, Trump strongly
opposes a policy of international entanglements, and will demand that
other countries stop depending on the USA for security— or at least pay
for it…. unlike prior presidents who simply kept stepping the US
into global quagmires, and subjecting us to foreign reprisals from
nations like Japan, Germany, Korea, Vietnam and the Middle East.
So
those who accuse Trump of presenting a risk of war, have no clue how it
works; war is always a negative-sum game, and as a businessman, Trump
works to maximize revenue, and so will avoid war anytime it can be avoided… which is always, since other countries are the same way.
In contrast, Hillary is the war-hawk who approved of the Iraq war, while Trump strongly opposed it; meanwhile Hillary is someone who has been shown to be personally violent against both her husband and the United States Secret Service agents, so I sure wouldn’t want her anywhere near something more lethal…. and there’s nothing more lethal than the US military, so God forbid she could become Commander-in-Chief of it!
On
the one hand, he’s shown he’s terse, intolerant, under-informed, and
prone to bad ventures and management decisions (e.g., four casino
bankruptcies). That would seem like someone who could cause a world war
if granted enough power.
On the other hand,
after a lukewarm nod, he came out clearly against the Iraq invasion, by
which we might infer he wouldn’t have started it.
People
could use any of the first-hands to explain their apprehension, but we
really wouldn’t know what he would do without unambiguous declarations
beforehand, or after the fact.
Another reality
is masses of people and nations are being pushed so far in a negative
way that a large-scale calamity wouldn’t be a surprising result no
matter who is president of the United States.
Currently
as of 2016 there are only a few countries in the world that are NOT
involved in a conflict or war of some kind. Something like a dozen give
or take one or two this week. I don’t know how to define a world war
other than the vast majority of countries being at war with someone? We
are in a world war right now.
Could Donald
Trump use nuclear weapons that would be met with other super powers and
less than super powers using nuclear weapons on us as a response? OF
COURSE. Also because that’s the only real factor that holds him back and
because of his false sense of superiority it is almost guaranteed he
will nuke someone to prove they won’t respond.
I
can see where your coming from with that as he appears to be a robust
and in your face leader will not under circumstances take no messing
from the likes of Putin. At least that is how he comes over but
remember Ronald Reagan or do your research was a very assertive
politician in the 80s as regards American foreign policy but did that
result in WWIII?
As far as I know though Reagan did not go round making statements like Trump and as to whether that is any guide as to how he will perform as President I cannot say. He may not even believe what he is espousing it maybe just to get the votes of a certain section of the US population who want something different from the Obama years.
Lets wait and see what happens.
As far as I know though Reagan did not go round making statements like Trump and as to whether that is any guide as to how he will perform as President I cannot say. He may not even believe what he is espousing it maybe just to get the votes of a certain section of the US population who want something different from the Obama years.
Lets wait and see what happens.
Is this Mr. Tigerli?
 |
Betty MacDonald's Vashon Island is a paradise.
info to: Sandra Lorinda Traci Petr Dana Jana Michaela Rebekah Swiss Charrd Tru John Darsie Darsie Toby Jeanine Carol Justin Lila Daniel Mo Nika Steve Neal Jitka Jitka Tami Pete Laurie Maia Nancy Kelly Pam Mary Jan and all our other friends
www.bettymacdonaldfanclub.blogspot.com/
info to: Sandra Lorinda Traci Petr Dana Jana Michaela Rebekah Swiss Charrd Tru John Darsie Darsie Toby Jeanine Carol Justin Lila Daniel Mo Nika Steve Neal Jitka Jitka Tami Pete Laurie Maia Nancy Kelly Pam Mary Jan and all our other friends
www.bettymacdonaldfanclub.blogspot.com/
Take an illustrated day trip through Washington state’s largest city with artist Candace Rose Rardon.
gadventures.com
Linda White yes,if my health allows.I have a few problems but is something I have always wanted to do,especially as I reread her books.
Unlike · Reply · 1 · August 1 at 6:37pm
Linde Lund Dear Linda I'll keep you posted.
Like · Reply · 1 · August 1 at 6:42pm
Bella Dillon · Friends with Darsie Beck
I still read Mrs Piggle Wiggle books to this day. I love her farm on vashon.
Unlike · Reply · 1 · August 1 at 10:32pm
Lila Taylor Good morning...Linde Lund
Unlike · Reply · 1 · 18 hrs
